Staff development for online delivery: A collaborative, team based action learning model
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Volume 16, Number 1, ISSN 0814-673X Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education
For academics to successfully make the transition to online teachers or learning facilitators, they must do more than develop new technical skills. Online development and delivery requires new pedagogical approaches, challenging previous practices with regards to assessment, group interaction and student/teacher dialogue. Furthermore, it necessitates attention to issues concerning academic work practices. Online delivery challenges traditional notions of academics working in isolation and instead brings together teams of people each with unique skills, into a course design and development team.
This paper describes the early phases of a systems change approach being implemented in the School of Social and Workplace Development at Southern Cross University. An ongoing collaborative action learning model is described as a vehicle for staff development and change management. This consisted of twice weekly team meetings and training sessions. These sessions represented a balance of outside expertise and experiences being brought into the group, and reflective and "idea sharing" sessions amongst the development team itself. A mixture of technological, pedagogical and managerial issues were covered and discussions were fully documented throughout the process.
Information on changing staff attitudes was collected via a series of semi-structured interviews recorded at various stages over the course of unit development and early delivery stages, as well as staff completing weekly "reflection sheets" on their experiences. Enthusiasm, collaboration and a sense of ownership are identified as major factors driving the change process. Major barriers included difficulties of dividing time between varied commitments, the importance of timeliness of training components and the need to develop policy and guidelines "on the run". Further data collection such as time commitments from staff and skill requirements at each phase of development were used to develop guidelines and recommendations for further rounds of development and for budgetary planning.
Ellis, A. & Phelps, R. (2000). Staff development for online delivery: A collaborative, team based action learning model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 26-44. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Gail Wilson, Elizabeth Stacey & Elizabeth Stacey
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 20, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2004)
Sue Trinidad, Jill Aldridge, Barry Fraser & Barry Fraser
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 21, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2005)
Meg O'Reilly, Diane Newton & Diane Newton
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 18, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2002)
Moving Online: A Best Practice Approach to Achieving a Quality Learning Experience for Online Education
Sue Whale & Naomi McGrath, UNE Business School, University of New England, Australia; Alana Blackburn, School of Arts, University of New England, Australia; Llara McClenaghan & Tim Cluley, UNE Business School, University of New England, Australia
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2014 (Oct 27, 2014) pp. 2032–2037
Lockias Chitanana, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe; Daga Makaza & Kudakwashe Madzima, National University of Science and Technology, Zimbabwe
International Journal of Education and Development using ICT Vol. 4, No. 2 (Jul 05, 2008) pp. 5–15
Tamar Shamir-Inbal, Jacob Dayan & Yael Kali, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Vol. 5, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2009) pp. 307–334
Is The Quality Of (Online) Courses Significantly Improved Through Professional Development Of Faculty? Student Perceptions
Janet Buckenmeyer, Emily Hixon & Casimir Barczyk, Purdue University Calumet, United States; David Freitas, Indiana Unversity South Bend, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 199–203
Emily Hixon & Janet Buckenmeyer, Purdue University Calumet, United States; David Freitas, Indiana University South Bend, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010 (Oct 18, 2010) pp. 1771–1777
Emily Hixon, Janet Buckenmeyer, Casimir Barczyk & Lori Feldman, Purdue University Calumet, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2009 (Jun 22, 2009) pp. 2387–2390
Norm Hays & Lee Allen, University of Memphis, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (Oct 15, 2007) pp. 922–929
Debbi Weaver, Monash University, Australia
International Journal on E-Learning Vol. 5, No. 2 (April 2006) pp. 275–286
Dorit Maor, Murdoch University, Australia; Catherine McLoughlin, Australian Catholic University, Australia
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005 (October 2005) pp. 914–919
Swee Kit Alan Soong, Centre for Educational Development, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Chun Hu, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 2699–2703
McLoughlin Catherine, Australian catholic University, Australia; Dorit Maor, Murdoch University, Australia
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 2606–2610
Debbi Weaver, Monash University, Australia
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2004 (2004) pp. 3438–3444
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.