You are here:

Developing EFL students' vocabulary size and TOEIC performance through CALL
PROCEEDINGS

, Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan, R.O.C., Taiwan

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-92-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Technology has brought forth countless changes in terms of the teaching and learning pedagogies, more evident are in the areas of language learning. This study investigates the effects of CALL software on vocabulary learning and TOEIC performance. The software, displaying the words, pronunciation, and L1 translation, was designed to explicitly develop learners’ TOEIC vocabulary size and automatcity of word recognition. Participants were sophomore students from a technology university in northern Taiwan. Data are assessment of vocabulary tests, TOEIC scores, questionnaire, and students’ comments. Results show that intervention of using CALL software facilitates vocabulary acquisition and improves TOEIC performance. There is a high significant difference between the pre/posttests of both vocabulary and TOEIC. Students show positive attitude toward using CALL to learn vocabulary and over 87% agreed that the features of word+sound+Chinese translation and repeated appearance of the target words facilitated vocabulary retention, which in turn benefits their TOEIC performance.

Citation

Huang, C.P. (2012). Developing EFL students' vocabulary size and TOEIC performance through CALL. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2843-2848). Austin, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 4, 2020 from .

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning& Technology, 5(1), 202-232.
  2. Bonk, W. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14, 14-31.
  3. Brown, A.F. (2010). Vocabulary knowledge and comprehension in second language text processing: A reciprocal relationship? The Asian EFL Journal, 20 (1), 88-133.
  4. Chapelle, C.A, & Jamieson, J. (2008). Tips for teaching with CALL: Practical approaches to computer-assisted language learning. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
  5. Chen, K.Y. (2011). The impact of EFL students’ vocabulary breadth of knowledge on literal reading comprehension. Asian EFL Journal, 51, 30-40.
  6. Chou, P.T.Z. (2011). The effects of vocabulary knowledge and background knowledge on reading comprehension of Taiwanese EFL students. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8 (1), 108-115.
  7. Chujo, K. & Oghigian, K. (2009). How many words do you need to know to understand TOEIC, TOEFL& EIKEN? An examination of text coverage and high frequency vocabulary. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6 (2), 121-148.
  8. Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55-75.
  9. Groot, P.J.M. (2000). Computer assisted second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning and Technology, 4(1), 60-81.
  10. Huang, C.C. (2004). University students’ vocabulary knowledge, content knowledge and reading comprehension. Journal of National Tainan Teachers College: Humanities and Social Science, 38 (1), 125-153.
  11. Kelly, P. (1991). Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language learners. IRAL, 29(2), 135-149.
  12. Ma, Q. & Kelly, P. (2006). Computer assisted vocabulary learning: Design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19 (1), 15-45.
  13. Mondria, J.-A. (2003). The effects of inferring, verifying, and memorizing on the retention of L2 word meanings: An experimental comparison of the ‘‘Meaning-Inferred Method’’and the ‘‘Meaning-Given Method.’’ Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(4), 473–499.
  14. Nakayama, N. (2007). Cross-sectional analyses of TOEIC vocabulary. Proceedings of Maebashi Kyoai Gakuen College, 7, 155-170.
  15. Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  16. Spiri, J. (2008). Online study of frequency list vocabulary with the WordChamp website. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 7 (1), 21-36.
  17. Stæhr, L.S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as aforeign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 577-607.
  18. Tozcu, A. & Coady, J. (2004). Successful learning of frequent vocabulary through CALL also benefits reading comprehension and speed. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17 (5), 473-495.
  19. Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217–234.
  20. Wilkins, D.A. (1972). Linguistics and language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
  21. Yeh, Y., & Wang, C. (2003). Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 131-144.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides

Also Read

Related Collections