You are here:

Lecture Capture: Student Perceptions, Expectations, and Behaviors
PROCEEDINGS

, Information Technologies and Computing Division, University of Tel-Aviv, Israel ; , Center of Information Management and Virtual Teaching, University of Osnabrueck, Germany ; , Laboratory for Advanced Research in Intelligent Educational Systems, University of Saskatchewan, Canada

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Orlando, Florida, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-83-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

The decrease in cost and increase in automation of audio visual systems for the classroom has led to widespread deployment of lecture capture within higher education. While a number of studies have examined the effectiveness of such systems within an institution, no study has characterized student background across institutions. In this paper we describe three different lecture capture systems deployed in three different higher education institutions worldwide. We note particular interesting investigations we have made into how students use these systems, and outline how our current work in the opencast community project will be used to provide more rigorous cross-institution analysis options of lecture capture systems.

Citation

Barokas, J., Ketterl, M. & Brooks, C. (2010). Lecture Capture: Student Perceptions, Expectations, and Behaviors. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2010--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 424-431). Orlando, Florida, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 13, 2019 from .

© 2010 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Breuer, F., Breitner, M.H. (2008). Aufzeichnungen und Podcasting akademischer Veranstaltungen in der Region D-A-CH, Ausgewä hlte Ergebnisse und Benchmarks einer Expertenbefragung. IWI Discussion Paper Session 26, Institut fü r Wirtschaftsinformatik, Universit ä t Hannover.
  2. Deal, A. (2007). Lecture Webcasting: A Teaching with Technology White Paper. Computing Services. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University. 2007
  3. Friedland, G., Knipping, L., Tapia, E. And Rojas, R. (2004). “ Teaching With an Intelligent Electronic Chalkboard, ” Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2004, Workshop on Effective Telepresence, New York, October 2004.
  4. Hermann, C., Lauer, T., Trahasch, S. (2006). Eine lernerzentrierte Evaluation des Einsatzes von Vorlesungs-aufzeichnungen zur Unterst ü tzung der Pr ä senzlehre. In: Tagungsband der 4. E-Learning Fachtagung Informatik (DeLFI 2006), Seiten 39– 50.
  5. Hürst, W., Deutschmann, N. (2006) “ Searching in recorded lectures, ” Proceedings of the World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate Government, Healthcare& Higher Education (E-Learn 2006), AACE, Honolulu, HI, USA, October 2006.
  6. Hürst, W., Welte, M. And Waizenegger, W. (2006) “ Podcasting von Vorlesungen in der universit ä ren Lehre, ” Proceedings of the DeLFI 2006 Workshop AudioLearning 2006 (AuLe 2006), Darmstadt, Germany, September 2006.
  7. Ketterl, M., Mertens, R., Vornberger, O. (2008) Bringing Web 2.0 to Web Lectures, International Journal of Interactive Technology and Smart Education (ITSE); 6(2), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009, pp. 82-96.
  8. Lauer, T. & Ottmann, T. (2002). Means and Methods in Automatic Courseware Production: Experience and Technical Challenges. World Conference on E-Learning in Corp., Govt., Health., & Higher Ed. 2002(1), 553-560.
  9. Mertens, R., Ketterl, M., Vornberger, O. (2007). The virtPresenter lecture recording system: Automated production of web lectures with interactive content overviews. International Journal of Interactive Technology and Smart Education (ITSE), 4 (1). Februar 2007. Troubador publishing, UK. Pp. 55-66.
  10. Müller, R., Ottmann, T. & Zhang, H. (2002). Presentation Recording as a means to go Virtual for Campus-Based Universities. In Issues and Trends of IT Management in Contemporary Organizations: 2002 Information Resources Management Association International Conference. Mai 2002, Seattle, WA, USA. S. 567-570.
  11. Michael-Brian C. (2009). Complementary Podcasted and Face-to-face Lectures: Students’ Preferences and Their Perceived Future Value, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia& Telecommunications (ED-Media 2009), Honolulu, HI, USA, 22-26. Juni 2009, pp. 427-432.
  12. Rohs, M., Streule, R. (2009). Untersuchungen von eLectures an Hochschulen-Sichtung eines Forschungsfeldes Workshop eLectures 2009 im Rahmen der 7. E-Learning Fachtagung der GI (DeLFI), September 2009
  13. Schulze, L., Ketterl, M., Hamborg, K.-C. & Gruber, C. (2007). Gibt es mobiles Lernen mit Podcasts?-Wie Vorlesungsaufzeichungen genutzt werden. 5. E-Learning Fachtagung Informatik, Siegen, 17.-20. September 2007. S.233-244.
  14. Ziewer, P. (2006). “ Flexible and Automated Production of Full-Fledged Electronic Lectures, ” Technische Universit ä t M ü nchen, Ph. D. Thesis. November 2006.
  15. Zupancic, B., & Horz, H. (2002). Lecture recording and its use in a traditional university course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education), 34(3), 24-28.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read