Web 2.0 in a Preservice Math Methods Course: Teacher Candidates’ Perceptions and Predictions
Shannon Guerrero, Northern Arizona University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Diego, CA, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-78-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
Web 2.0 tools hold tremendous potential to transform the way we think about teaching and learning, especially in content areas such as mathematics. Though not as easily perceived as tools that could support content development, there are relevant applications of Web 2.0 tools in mathematics and mathematics education. This study investigated the ways in which preservice secondary mathematics teacher candidates thought about and utilized Web 2.0 tools as students in a mathematics methods course and perceived and predicted their uses of Web 2.0 tools as future educators. Results indicate that students grew in their understanding and appreciation of Web 2.0 tools in support of mathematics teaching and learning. Students especially saw value in these tools to promote communication and collaboration. Limitations of Web 2.0 tools in allowing for content-specific tasks like graphing, equation editing and tracking solutions are also discussed.
Guerrero, S. (2010). Web 2.0 in a Preservice Math Methods Course: Teacher Candidates’ Perceptions and Predictions. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2729-2736). San Diego, CA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/33783/.
- Barker, K. & Wendel, T. (2001). E-learning: Studying Canada’s virtual secondary schools. Kelowna, BC, Soceity for the Advancement of Excellence in Education.
- Dede, C. (2008). A seismic shift in epistemology. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(3), P. 80 – 81. Retrieved October 3, 2009, from
- Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
- Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J.E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246 – 259.
- International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). The ISTE national educational technology standards (NETS-S) and performance indicators for students. Retrieved on August 20, 2009, from http://www.iste.org.
- Lenhart, A., Arafeh, S., Smith, A., & Macgill, A.R. (2008). Writing, technology, and teens. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrived September 25, 2009, from http://pewInternet.org.
- Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hiltin, P. (2005). Teens and technology. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved September 20, 2009, from http://pewInternet.org.
- Levin, D., Arahef, S., Lenhart, S., & Rainie, L. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved September 21, 2009, from http://pewInternet.org.
- McMahon, M. (1997). Social constructivism and the worldwide web– A paradigm for learning. Paper presented at Australian Soceity for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference, Perth, Western Australia, December 1997. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth97/papers/Mcmahon/Mcmahon.html.
- Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digit age. Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), (online). Retrieved September 15, 2009, http://itdl.org.
- Wells, J. & Lewis, L. (2006). Internet access in U.S. Public schools and classrooms: 1994 – 2005 (NCES 2007 – 020). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved September 20, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.