You are here:

Synchronous Educational Robotics Competitions in the Virtual World PROCEEDINGS

, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, United States ; , University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States ; , University of Nebraska at Omaha, United States ; , University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Honolulu, HI, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-73-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC


Robotics competitions with middle and high school students are well-established mechanisms to enhance student interest and engagement in STEM career pathways and to build teamwork skills. However, synchronous in-person competitions pose a variety of barriers that may limit student participation. To combat the most prevalent barrier, travel and associated costs, the Nebraska 4-H Robotics and GPS/GIS project ran a virtual robotics competition where teams of participants competed in real-time from geographically dispersed sites across the state. This exploratory study examined the effectiveness of a virtual robotic competition to help foster student competencies in work related skills.


Barker, B., Nugent, G., Grandgenett, N. & Adamchuk, V. (2009). Synchronous Educational Robotics Competitions in the Virtual World. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2009--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3237-3242). Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 23, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Beer, R., Hillel, J., Chiel, J., & Drushel, R. (1999). Using Robotics to Teach Science and Engineering. Communications of the ACM, 42(6), 85-92.
  2. Blalock, L., Strieter, L., & Hughes, L. (2006). The SCANS Skills and Competencies Checklist: An Assessment Tool for Youth Work Readiness Programs. Journal of Youth Development: Bridging Research and Practice, 1(1).
  3. FIRST (2008). 2009 FLL Product Descriptions and Pricing, from Lauwers, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Hamner, E. (2009). CSBots: Design and development of a robot designed for the CS1 classroom. Paper presented at the SIGCSE 09, Chattanooga, TN.
  4. Ma, Y., Lai, G., Prejean, L., Ford, M., & Williams, D. (2007). Acquisition of Physics Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Robotics Summer Camp. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE), San Antonio, Texas.
  5. Melchior, F., Cohen, F., & Leavitt, T. (2005). More than robots: An evaluation of the first robotics competition participants and institutional impacts Retrieved 4/3/2009, 2009, from Nourbakhsh, I.R., Crowley, K., Bhave, A., Hamner, E., Hsiu, T., Perez-Bergquist, A., et al. (2005). The Robotic Autonomy Mobile Robotics Course: Robot Design, Curriculum Design and Educational Assessment. Autonomous Robots, 18(1), 103-127.
  6. Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3/4), 17-28.
  7. Weinberg, J.B., Pettibone, J.C., Thomas, S.L., Stephen, M.L., & Stein, C. (2007). The Impact of Robot Projects on Girls AttitudesToward Science and Engineering. Paper presented at the Robotics Science and Systems (RSS) Workshop on Research in Robots for Education. From U.S. Department of Labor (1992). Learning for living: A blueprint for high performance. Washington D.C.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact