You are here:

Developing an E-Learning Strategy in Higher Education
PROCEEDINGS

, Warren National University, United States ; , Western Governors University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Charleston, SC, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-67-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

Budget cuts, socioeconomic pressures and an increasing demand for flexible market-led curriculum are key challenges facing Higher Education Institutions. Without an e-learning program and strategies for its implementation, these institutions may be faced with decreasing market share as students opt for the flexibility and affordability of anywhere, anytime learning. Developing an effective strategy which incorporates a participatory pedagogy along with cost effective technology can help overcome these challenges. The five main stages of developing an e-learning strategy will be discussed. The planning stage determines the learning management system, the delivery method and the means of instruction. The technology stage focuses on bandwidth, technical support, and media types. Development decisions are determined in the third stage and implementation and roll-out strategies are established in stage four. The final stage sets up control and outcome measurement mechanisms.

Citation

Tucker, J. & Gentry, G. (2009). Developing an E-Learning Strategy in Higher Education. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2702-2707). Charleston, SC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 25, 2020 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Angelo, J.M. (2002). Courseware costs soar: blackboard and WebCT rethink pricing models; competition seizes opportunity to price-cut. BNET Business Network. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0LSH/is_4_5/ai_95447612
  2. Aragon, S.R., Johnson, S.D., & Shaik, N. (2002). The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16 (4), 227-244.
  3. Bartley, S.J., & Golek, J.H. (2004). Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Instruction. Educational Technology& Society, 7 (4), 167-175.
  4. Blackwood, H. (2008, July 10). State budget cuts trickle down to local colleges. The Gainesville Times. From http://media.www.bsudailynews.com/media/storage/paper849/news/2008/09/16/News/Blackboard.Costs.Bsu.1010003432621.shtml
  5. Dalsgaard, C. (2006). Social software: E-Learning beyond learning management systems. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2006(I) Dongsong Zhang, Jay F. Nunamaker. (2003). Powering E-Learning In the New Millennium: An Overview of E-Learning and Enabling Technology. Information Systems Frontiers: Special Issue: Advances in Software Engineering: Theory and, 5(2), 207-218. Retrieved October 3, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Document ID: 501063211)
  6. Dublin, L. (2007, August 20). Implementing e-learning the right way. Manage Smarter. Retrieved October 6, 2008, from http://www.managesmarter.com/msg/content_display/training/e3i860b8f4c465fb30a38056300c13950b8
  7. Dyche, J. (2002). The CRM handbook. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Pearson Education.
  8. Emerson, A. (2008, July 27). Online-class enrollment accelerates into fall. The Tampa Tribune, P. 10.
  9. Harris, P. (2003, February 18). ROI of e-learning: Closing in. Learning Circuits. Retrieved October 3, 2008, from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2003/feb2003/
  10. Holmes, B. And Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning: Concepts and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
  11. Lake, R. (2008, April 6). State-mandated budget cuts: College looks at more savings. The Las Vegas Review Journal.
  12. Lesniak, B. (2002, July 30). Putting it to the test: Quality control for e-learning courses. The E-Learning Developers Journa. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.elearningguild.com/pdf/2/073002dev-H.pdf
  13. Lingenfelter, P.E. (2005). Responsibilities of governing bodies in the United States of America. Retrieved August 11, 2008, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/55/26/37378272.pdf.
  14. Moad, J. (2006). Microsoft taps new enterprise apps leader. Retrieved September 18, 2008, from http://www.managingautomation.com/maonline/news/read/Microsoft_Taps_New_Enterprise_Apps_Leader_22934
  15. Morrison, D. (2003). E-learning strategies: How to get implementation and delivery right the first time. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.
  16. Paddock, R.C. (2008, April 17). Hardship predicted for students. The Los Angeles Times, P.B-1.
  17. Ramirez, E. (2008, January 10). This bus is plugged In: Wi-Fi lets Arkansas kids study on their commute. U.S. News and World Report. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from http://www.usnews.com/articles/education/e-learning/2008/01/10/this-bus-isplugged-in.html
  18. Rosenberg, M.J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Professional.
  19. Servage, L. (2005). Strategizing for workplace e-learning: some critical considerations. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(5/6), 304-317. Retrieved September 27, 2008, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 896750491)
  20. Walliker, P.T. (2005, June). Cost comparison: Instructor-led vs. E-learning. Learning Circuits. Retrieved October 6, 2008, from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2005/jun2005/walliker.htm
  21. Welsh, E., Wanberg, C., Brown, K. And Simmering, M. (2003), E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 245-258.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections