You are here:

Can group developmental processes influence teamwork satisfaction and performance in the online collaboration context?
PROCEEDINGS

, , , Univ. of Northern Colorado, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-64-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to seek greater clarity in our understanding of teamwork processes that have impacts in teamwork satisfaction and performance. The researchers will investigate and observe how team members' relationships and group dynamics are built over time based on the four stages of Tuckman's theoretical model (forming, storming, norming, and performing) of group development.

Citation

Tseng, H., Wang, C.H. & Ku, H.Y. (2008). Can group developmental processes influence teamwork satisfaction and performance in the online collaboration context?. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2008--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 777-782). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 14, 2019 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Brufee, K. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  2. Byer, N., & Weston, R.H. (2005). Monitoring and predicting the rate of team system development. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18(4), 308-328.
  3. Chung, H., Rodes, P., & Knapczyk, D. (1998). Using web conferencing to promote ownership in distance education coursework. In H. Mauer & R. Olsen (Eds.), Proceedings of WebNet 98-World Conference of the WWW, Internet and Intranet. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Academic Computing.
  4. Clark, D.R. (2004). Instructional system design concept map. Retrieved May 30, 2007, from http://nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/ahold/isd.html
  5. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, F.P. (2000). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (7th ed.). Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN.
  6. Miller, D.L. (2003). The stages of group development: A retrospective study of dynamic team processes. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20(2), 121-134.
  7. Panitz, T. (2001). The case for student-centered instruction via collaborative learning paradigms. Retrieved December 25, 2006, from http://home.capecod.net/~tpanitz/tedsarticles/coopbenefits.htm
  8. Tseng, H.W., Wang, C.H., & Ku, H.-Y. (2006, October). The relationship between teamwork outcomes, teamwork satisfactions, and collaboration factors in an online environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Computer in Education (AACE), Honolulu, HA.
  9. Tuckman, B.W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
  10. Uribe, D., Klein, J.D., & Sullivan, H. (2003). The effect of computer-mediated collaborative learning on solving ill-defined problems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 5-19.
  11. Wang, M., Poole, M., Harris, B., & Wangemann, P. (2001). Promoting online collaborative learning experiences for teenagers. Education Media International, 38(4), 203-215.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References