You are here:

Analyzing Student Performance and Attitudes Toward Textual versus Iconic Programming Languages
Article

, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan ; , Xiu De Elementary School, Taiwan

JCMST Volume 28, Number 1, ISSN 0731-9258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

In this study half of 52 sixth graders learned to program in MSWLogo and the other half in Drape. An analysis of students' test scores revealed that Drape (an iconic language) seemed to have a steeper learning curve than MSWLogo (a textual language). However, as students gradually became more familiar with either language, the difference in student performance narrowed. With respect to usability, students of the MSWLogo group made syntactic errors frequently, whereas students of the Drape group were often confused by icons that were not intuitively clear or icons that looked similar. No significant difference was found between the two groups in how much they enjoyed programming or if they would like to learn to program again. It was concluded that iconic programming languages might not be more suitable than textual languages for elementary school students.

Citation

Lin, J.M.C. & Yang, M.C. (2009). Analyzing Student Performance and Attitudes Toward Textual versus Iconic Programming Languages. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 28(1), 71-89. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 15, 2019 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References