You are here:

Media Choice in Students’ Communication
PROCEEDINGS

, University of Vienna, Austria

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-62-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

This paper presents a qualitative study on the reality of communication among students of Computer Science. A preliminary study indicated nine major means of communication that were predominantly used by students to converse with their colleagues. Those most eminent and therefore those that were investigated are: course platforms, the student representatives' board, e-mail, instant messaging, face-to-face meetings, meeting at university courses, mobile phones, Short Message Service, phone calls via the internet. The students' media choices were explained within the framework of the Media Synchronicity Theory, resulting in a series of practical suggestions for the choice of communications in Blended Learning situations.

Citation

Figl, K. (2007). Media Choice in Students’ Communication. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2007--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 653-661). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 14, 2021 from .

© 2007 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
  2. Dennis, A.R., & Valacich, J.S. (1999). Rethinking Media Richness: Towards a Theory of Media Synchronicity. Proceedings of Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos.
  3. Köhler, T. (1999). Sozialwissenschaftliche Theorien und Befunde zu r computervermittelten Kommunikation. In W. Frindte & T. Köhler (Eds.), Kommunikation im Internet (pp. 137-182). Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
  4. Mangler, J., & Derntl, M. (2004). CEWebS-Cooperative Environment Web Services. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Knowledge Management (I-KNOW '04), June 30-July 2, Graz, Austria, pp. 617-624.
  5. Mayring, P. (2003). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse (8 ed.). Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.
  6. Motschnig-Pitrik, R., Derntl, M., & Mangler, J. (2004). Developing Cooperative Environment Web Services based on Action Research. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management (PAKM 2004), Vienna, Austria, pp. 453-462.
  7. Nohr, H. (2002). Elektronische vermittelte Wissenskommunikation und Medienwahl. Information-Wissensch aft und Praxis, 52(3), 141-148.
  8. Reichwald, R., Möslein, K., Sachenbacher, H., & Englberger, H. (1998). Telekooperation, Verteilte Arbeits-und Organisationsformen (2 ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.
  9. Schwabe, G. (2001). Mediensynchronizität-Theorie und Anwendung bei Gruppenarbeit und Lernen. In F. Hesse& H. Friedrich (Eds.), Partizipation und Interaktion im virtuellen Seminar. Münster: Waxmann.
  10. Schwabe, G. (2004). Medienwahl. In J. Haake, G. Schwabe & M. Wessner (Eds.), CSCL-Kompendium. Oldenbourg: Medienwahl.
  11. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
  12. Weigle, J., & Krcmar, H. (2000). Zur Funktionsweise Virtualisierter Organisationen. Stuttgart: Universität Hohenheim, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaftsinformatik.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read