You are here:

Technologically-Based Mentoring Provided to Teachers: A Synthesis of the Literature Article

, , , The University of Texas at Austin, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 16, Number 3, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA


Instructional coaching or mentoring, as a form of professional development for teachers, has gained importance as educational policy has called for the implementation of research-validated instructional practices by highly qualified teachers. Technology-mediated mentoring has strong potential for overcoming barriers of accessibility and cost-effectiveness associated with traditional on-site mentoring. The purpose of this article is to synthesize existing peer-reviewed empirical studies on technology-mediated mentoring for inservice teachers. Three mediums for technology-based mentoring were explored: technology-enhanced professional development coupled with access to a mentor, electronic mail, and online discussion forums. The synthesized studies primarily incorporated mixed-methodologies or were qualitative. Results suggest that, although usage of some technology-based mentoring implementations was low or variable, those who accessed the resources generally reported having a positive experience, reporting shifts in their attitudes towards instruction and changes in instructional practices; however, few studies substantiated teacher self-reported improvement in knowledge and practice through direct observation. While existing research is both informative and encouraging, more rigorous qualitative and quantitative research, particularly quasi-experimental and experimental studies, is needed. As no located studies addressed the impact of the technology-based mentoring of teachers on the outcomes of students, particular attention should be paid to this significant outcome variable in future research.


Gentry, L.B., Denton, C.A. & Kurz, T. (2008). Technologically-Based Mentoring Provided to Teachers: A Synthesis of the Literature. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(3), 339-373. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved August 15, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Annenberg Institute for School Reform (2004). Instructional coaching: Professional developments trategies that improve instruction. Providence , RI : Brown University.
  2. Egan, G. (2002). The skilled helper: A prob lem-managemen t and oppor tu n i ty-deve lopmen t approach to helping (7th ed.). Boston: Thompson/ Wadsworth.
  3. Hawkes, M. (2001). Variables of interest in exploring the reflective outcomes of ne twork-based communication. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33 (3), 299-315.
  4. Idol , L. (1992). The special educa tor’s consultation handbook. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  5. International Reading Association (2004). The role and qualifications of the reading coach in the United States: Apos i t ion statement of the International Reading Association. Newark , DE: Author. Retrieved March 1 , 2006 ,

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Developing Authentic e-Learning through Virtual Benchmarking

    Irja Leppisaari, Central Ostrobothnia University of Applied Sciences, Finland; Leena Vainio, Häme University of Applied Sciences, Finland; Jan Herrington, Murdoch University, Australia

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2009 (Jun 22, 2009) pp. 2609–2618

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact