Quality Towards an Expected Harmony: Pedagogy and Technology Speaking Together About Innovation
Article
Marcel Lebrun, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal) Volume 15, Number 2, ISSN 1065-6901 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
In this paper we will develop the following hypothesis as it relates to the field of educational technology in higher education: students, teachers and educational institutions are all concerned with a common underlying "learning model". The organization of these various levels (students, teachers, institutions) around learning may be considered as a guide and as a sign of an expected educational quality. In this case, the general models for learning and for pedagogical setup development may be used to develop new teaching or training methods, to promote innovation in institutions and to assess quality. After a short presentation of a "objectives - methods - tools " reference model, we will use this model to organize and to assess the question of the added value of ICT in learning. These factors of learning enhanced by ICT define a learning model consistent with learning factors as proposed by education sciences. The deduced learning model will then be used to understand and to foster teacher training and innovation in institutions.
Citation
Lebrun, M. (2007). Quality Towards an Expected Harmony: Pedagogy and Technology Speaking Together About Innovation. AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal), 15(2), 115-130. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/21024/.
© 2007 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Apple Computer, Inc. (1995). Changing the conversation about teaching, learning, & Technology: A report on 10 years of ACOT research. Cupertino, CA: Apple Computers, Inc.
- American Psychological Association (1995). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school redesign and reform (P. 12).
- Bagley, C., & Hunter, B. (1992). Restructuring, constructivism, and technology: Forging a new relationship. Educational Technology, 7, 22-27.
- Biggs, J.B. (1999). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 1-18.
- Biggs, J.B., & Telfer, R. (1987). The process of learning (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Prentice-Hall.
- Clark, R.E., & Leonard, S. (1985). Computer research confounding. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
- Combs, A.W. (1976). Fostering maximum development of the individual. In W. Van Til & K.J. Rehage (Eds.), Issues in secondary education. (NSSE Yearbook). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education
- Cooperrider, D.L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In W. Pasmore & R. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organization change and development (Vol. 1, pp. 129-169). Greenwich,
- Evers, F.T., Rush, J.C., & Berdrow, I. (1998). The bases of competence. Skills for lifelong learning and employability. San Francisco: JosseyBass Publishers.
- Fullan, M. (2000). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer.
- Hall, G., & Loucks, S. (1979). Implementing innovations in schools: A concerns-based approach. Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas.
- Kadiyala, M., & Crynes, B.L. (2000). A review of literature on effectiveness of use of information technology in education. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2), 177-190.
- Kulik, J., Kulik, C., & Cohen, P. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, 50, 525-544.
- Lebrun, M. (2002). Théories et méthodes pédagogiques pour enseigner et apprendre : Quelle place pour les TIC dans l’éducation ? [Theories and methods for teaching and learning: Which place for ICT in education ?].Bruxelles-Paris: De Boeck.
- Lebrun, M. (2005). ELearning pour enseigner et apprendre : Allier pédagogie et technologie [eLearning for teaching and learning: Pedagogy and Technology working together].Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia-Bruylant.
- Means, B. & Olson, K. (1994). The link between technology and authentic learning. Educational Leadership, 51.
- Piaget, J. (1975). L’équilibration des structures cognitives [Cognitive structures equilibration]. Paris: PUF.
- Savoie, J.M., & Hughes, A.S. (1994). Problem-based learning as classroom solution. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 54-57.
- Saljo, R. (1979). Learning in the learner’s perspective IV: Considering one’s own strategy (Rep. No. 79). Mölndal, Sweden: University of Gothenburg, Institute of Education.
- Shulman, L.S. (2004). Teaching as community property: Essays on higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Note 1. Above the microlearning level, three other levels may be proposed:
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References