You are here:

Gender stereotypes: The case of MisProfesores.com in Mexico
ARTICLE

, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, Mexico ; , El Colegio de México, Mexico

Economics of Education Review Volume 72, Number 1, ISSN 0272-7757 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

Abstract

In this study we analyze the extent of gender stereotypes in student evaluations of college professors on the internet site MisProfesores.com in Mexico. We downloaded more than 600,000 evaluations for the period 2008–18. The evaluations include three scores on a scale of 0 to 10: how easy it is to obtain a good grade, how much the professor helps his or her students obtain good grades, and how clearly the professor presents the concepts of the course. The site also allows students to comment on the professor and the class, and we performed a quantitative text analysis of these comments. We found that women receive lower scores than their male counterparts, although the difference is relatively small: 1–2% of a standard deviation. Students refer more to the appearance and personality of female professors, and describe them more often as “bad” or “strict.” They also refer to women in less respectful terms, calling them “maestra” (“teacher”), but calling men “profesor” or “licenciado” (the title corresponding to their academic degree), and they use less positive language for women (“good” vs. “great” or “excellent” for men). Finally, words associated with qualities of service (traditionally stereotyped as feminine) favor women more than men; whereas, words with traditionally masculine associations have a negative impact on women's evaluations.

Citation

Arceo-Gomez, E.O. & Campos-Vazquez, R.M. (2019). Gender stereotypes: The case of MisProfesores.com in Mexico. Economics of Education Review, 72(1), 55-65. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved September 29, 2023 from .

This record was imported from Economics of Education Review on June 3, 2019. Economics of Education Review is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.05.007

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Andersen, S., Ertac, S., Gneezy, U., List, J.A., & Maximiano, S. (2013). Gender, competitiveness, and socialization at a young age: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4), pp. 1438-1443.
  2. Arceo-Gomez, E., & Campos-Vazquez, R. (2014). Race and marriage in the labor market: A discrimination correspondence study in a developing country. American Economic Review, 104(5), pp. 376-380.
  3. Babcock, L., Recalde, M.P., Vesterlund, L., & Weingart, L. (2017). Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. American Economic Review, 107(3), pp. 714-747.
  4. Bayer, A., & Rouse, C. (2016). Diversity in the economics profession: A new attack on an old problem. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(4), pp. 221-242.
  5. Beaman, L., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2012). Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: A policy experiment in India. Science, 335(6068), pp. 582-586.
  6. Bertrand, M., Chugh, D., & Mullainathan, S. (2005). Implicit discrimination. American Economic Review, 95(2), pp. 94-98.
  7. Bleske-Rechek, A., & Michels, K. (2010). RateMyProfessors.com: Testing assumptions about students use and misuse. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(5), pp. 1-12.
  8. Bohnet, I. (2016). What works: Gender equality by design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  9. Boring, A. (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics, 145, pp. 27-41.
  10. Brown, M.J., Baillie, M., & Fraser, S. (2009). Rating Ratemyprofessors.com: A comparison of online and official student evaluations of teaching. College Teaching, 57(2), pp. 89-92.
  11. Card, D., Vigna, S.D., Funk, P., & Iriberri, N. (2018). Are referees and editors in economics gender neutral?. Available online: https://eml.berkeley.edu/~sdellavi/wp/EditorGender_Oct24.pdf.
  12. Clayson, D.E. (2014). What does ratemyprofessors.com actually rate?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(6), pp. 678-698.
  13. Coladarci, T., & Kornfield, I. (2007). RateMyProfessors.com versus formal in-class student evaluations of teaching. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(6), pp. 1-15.
  14. Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(5), pp. 642-658.
  15. Dreber, A., von Essen, E., & Ranehill, E. (2014). Gender and competition in adolescence: Task matters. Experimental Economics, 17(1), pp. 154-172.
  16. El-Alayli, A., Hansen-Brown, A.A., & Ceynar, M. (2018). Dacing backwards in high heels: Female professors experience more work demand and special favor requests, particularly from academically entitled students. Sex Roles, 79(3–4), pp. 136-150.
  17. Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, pp. 275-298.
  18. Felton, J., Koper, P.T., Mitchell, J., & Stinson, M. (2008). Attractiveness, easiness and other issues: Student evaluations of professors on Ratemyprofessors.com. Assessment & Evaluation of Higher Education, 33(1), pp. 45-61.
  19. Ghosh, P., & Liu, Z. (2018). Coautorship and the gender gap in top economics journal publications. Available online: https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2019/preliminary/paper/Ys2aSyBR.
  20. Gneezy, U., Leonard, K.L., & List, J.A. (2009). Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica, 77(5), pp. 1637-1664.
  21. Goldin, C., & Rouse, C. (2000). Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of "blind" auditions on female musicians. American Economic Review, 90(4), pp. 715-741.
  22. Gregory, K.M. (2012). How undergraduates perceive their professors: A corpus analysis of Rate My Professor. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(2), pp. 169-193.
  23. Guarino, C.M., & Borden, V.M.H. (2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family?. Research in Higher Education, 58(6), pp. 672-694.
  24. Hengel, E. (2019). Publishing while female: Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. Available online: http://www.erinhengel.com/research/publishing_female.pdf.
  25. Hengel, E. (2019). Gender differences in citations at top economic journals. Even more evidence that women are held to higher standards in peer review. Available online: https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2019/preliminary/paper/Y4Fdr86H.
  26. INEGI (2015). Estadísticas a propósito del día del maestro. Available online: http://www.inegi.org.mx/saladeprensa/aproposito/2015/maestro0.pdf.
  27. Kindred, J., & Mohammed, S.N. (2005). ‘He will crush you like an academic ninja!’: Exploring teacher ratings on Ratemyprofessors.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3) Available online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00257.x.
  28. Koch, A.J., D'Mello, S.D., & Sackett, P.R. (2015). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), pp. 128-161.
  29. MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A.N. (2015). What's in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), pp. 291-303.
  30. Mengel, F., Sauermann, J., & Zölitz, U. (2019). Gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association, 17(2), pp. 535-566.
  31. Miller, D., Eagly, A., & Linn, M. (2015). Women's representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), pp. 631-644.
  32. Mitchell, K.M.W., & Martin, J. (2018). Gender bias in student evaluations. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(3), pp. 648-652.
  33. Legg, A.M., & Wilson, J.H. (2012). RateMyProfessors.com offers biased evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), pp. 89-97.
  34. Lewandowski, G.W., Higgins, E., & Nardone, N.N. (2012). Just a harmless website? An experimental examination of RateMyProfessors.com's effect on student evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), pp. 987-1002.
  35. Otto, J., Sanford, D.A., & Ross, D.N. (2008). Does ratemyprofessor.com really rate my professor?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), pp. 355-368.
  36. Reid, L.D. (2010). The role of perceived race and gender in the evaluation of college teaching on RateMyProfessors.Com. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3(3), pp. 137-152.
  37. Rocha-Sánchez, T.E., & Díaz-Loving, R. (2005). Cultura de género: La brecha ideológica entre hombres y mujeres. Anales de Psicología, 21(1), pp. 42-49.
  38. Sarsons, H. (2018). Interpreting signals in the labor market Evidence from medical referrals. Available online: http://bit.ly/2zuENYB.
  39. Sarsons, H. (2019). Gender differences in recognition of group work. Available online: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PUFdQAgmKcHK1NXm-bQKUNdn-oo_cGr5/view.
  40. SEP (2017). Sistema educativo de los estados unidos mexicanos. México: Secretaría de Educación Pública. Available online: http://www.planeacion.sep.gob.mx/Doc/estadistica_e_indicadores/principales_cifras/principales_cifras_2016_2017.pdf.
  41. Sonntag, M.E., Bassett, J.F., & Snyder, T. (2009). An empirical test of the validity of student evaluations of teaching made on RateMyProfessors.com. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), pp. 499-504.
  42. Sutter, M., & Glätzle-Rützler, D. (2015). Gender differences in the willingness to compete emerge early in life and persist. Management Science, 61(10), pp. 2339-2354.
  43. Stuber, J.M., Watson, A., Clarke, A., & Staggs, K. (2009). Gender expectations and on-line evaluations of teaching: Evidence from RateMyProfessors.com. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), pp. 387-399.
  44. Timmerman, T. (2008). On the validity of RateMyProfessors.com. Journal of Education for Business, 84(1), pp. 55-61.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References