You are here:

Gender gaps in primary school achievement: A decomposition into endowments and returns to IQ and non-cognitive factors
ARTICLE

,

Economics of Education Review Volume 41, Number 1, ISSN 0272-7757 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

Abstract

In elementary school, girls typically outperform boys in languages and boys typically outperform girls in math. The determinants of these differences have remained largely unexplored. Using rich data from Dutch elementary schools, we decompose the differences in achievement into gender differences in endowments and returns to IQ and non-cognitive factors. This descriptive analysis is a thought experiment in which we show the consequences for school performance if girls and boys had similar resources and took similar advantage of these resources. Our findings indicate that gender differences in resources with respect to social and instrumental skills and need for achievement can explain part of the differences in performance. Boys seem to be better equipped with these resources. Additionally, boys and girls employ their skills differently. Girls take more advantage of their IQ than boys. Yet, the largest part of this parameter effect is left unexplained by IQ and non-cognitive factors.

Citation

Golsteyn, B.H.H. & Schils, T. (2014). Gender gaps in primary school achievement: A decomposition into endowments and returns to IQ and non-cognitive factors. Economics of Education Review, 41(1), 176-187. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved March 26, 2023 from .

This record was imported from Economics of Education Review on March 1, 2019. Economics of Education Review is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.04.001

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Barres, B. (2006). Does gender matter?. Nature, pp. 133-136.
  2. Becker, G.S., Hubbard, W.H.J., & Murphy, K.M. (2010). Explaining the worldwide boom in higher education of women. Journal of Human Capital, 4(3), pp. 203-241.
  3. Bedard, K., & Cho, I. (2010). Early gender test score gaps across OECD countries. Economics of Education Review, 29, pp. 348-363.
  4. Bertrand, M., & Pan, J. (2013). The trouble with boys: Social influences and the gender gap in disruptive behavior. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(1), pp. 32-64.
  5. Boaler, J. (1997). Reclaiming school mathematics: The girls fight back. Gender and Education, 9, pp. 285-305.
  6. Borghans, L., Duckworth, A., Heckman, J., & ter Weel, B. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43, pp. 972-1059.
  7. Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 7(6), pp. 477-484.
  8. Cornwell, C.M., Mustard, D.B., & van Parys, J. (2013). Noncognitive skills and the gender disparities in test scores and teacher assessments: Evidence from primary school. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), pp. 236-264.
  9. Costa, P.T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R.R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, pp. 322-331.
  10. Doolitle, A.E. (1989). Gender differences in performance on mathematics achievement items. Applied Measurement in Education, 2(2), pp. 161-177.
  11. Duckworth, A.L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M.D., & Kelly, D.R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, pp. 1087-1101.
  12. Duckworth, A.L., & Quinn, P.D. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit-scale (Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), pp. 166-174.
  13. Duckworth, A.L., & Seligman, M. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), pp. 198-208.
  14. Ellison, G., & Swanson, A. (2010). The gender gap in secondary school mathematics at high achievement levels: Evidence from the American mathematics competitions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), pp. 109-128.
  15. Epstein, D., Elwood, J., Hey, V., & Maw, J. (1998). Schoolboy frictions: Feminism and ‘failing’ boys. Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  16. European Commission (2010). Gender differences in educational outcomes: Study on the measures taken and the current situation in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice.
  17. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), pp. 429-456.
  18. Fortin, N. M., Oreopoulos, P., Phipps, S. (2013). Leaving boys behind: Gender disparities in high academic achievement. Paper presented at NBER SI 2013. Cambridge, MA.
  19. Fryer, R.G., & Levitt, S.D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), pp. 210-240.
  20. Gipps, C. (1996). Review and conclusions: A pedagogy or a range of pedagogic strategies?. Equity in the classroom: Towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys, pp. 260-271. London: Falmer Press.
  21. Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2004). Gender and competition at a young age. American Economic Review, 94(2), pp. 377-381.
  22. Husain, M., & Millimet, D.L. (2009). The mythical boy crisis. Economics of Education Review, 28, pp. 38-48.
  23. Hyde, J.S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), pp. 581-592.
  24. Jacobs, J.E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D.W., Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children's self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, pp. 509-527.
  25. Jann, B. (2008). The Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. The Stata Journal, 8(4), pp. 453-479.
  26. Lai, F. (2010). Are boys left behind? The evolution of the gender achievement gap in Beijing's middle schools. Economics of Education Review, 29, pp. 383-399.
  27. Marsh, H.W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A.J.S., & Trautwein, U. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through explanatory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), pp. 471-491.
  28. Poropat, A.E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), pp. 322-338.
  29. Sax, L. (2005). Why gender matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. New York: Doubleday.
  30. Spelke, E.S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review. American Psychologist, 60(9), pp. 950-958.
  31. Spinath, B., Freudenthaler, H.H., & Neubauer, A.C. (2010). Domain-specific school achievement in boys and girls as predicted by intelligence, personality and motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, pp. 481-486.
  32. Statistics Netherlands (2013). Statline online statistics. Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.
  33. Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2008). Sex differences in school achievement: What are the roles of personality and achievement motivation?. European Journal of Personality, 22, pp. 185-209.
  34. Tansel, A. (2002). Determinants of school attainment of boys and girls in Turkey: Individual, household and community factors. Economics of Education Review, 21, pp. 455-470.
  35. Tinklin, T. (2003). Gender differences and high attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(3), pp. 307-325.
  36. van Houtte, M. (2004). Why boys achieve less at school than girls: The difference between boys’ and girls’ academic culture. Educational Studies, 30, pp. 159-173.
  37. Vogel, S.A. (1990). Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities, and academic achievement in students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, pp. 44-52.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References