You are here:

Efficiency and costs in education: year-round versus traditional schedules
ARTICLE

,

Economics of Education Review Volume 20, Number 3 ISSN 0272-7757 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

Abstract

This study explores the cost savings (efficiency) of a year-round schedule versus a traditional 9-month schedule for schools in Clark County, Nevada. Unlike many previous studies, the cost of real estate capital is included in the estimated cost functions. The sample includes 115 elementary schools, 26 with a year-round schedule, and the study finds that this schedule not only produces efficiencies in the cost of capital area but also in other areas such as operations. These efficiencies are evident after taking into account the usual average daily attendance, test performance scores, and socioeconomic variables that are customarily used in such studies. The existence and size of efficiencies discovered in this study have implications for those school districts that face a rapidly growing student population.

Citation

Daneshvary, N. & Clauretie, T.M. Efficiency and costs in education: year-round versus traditional schedules. Economics of Education Review, 20(3), 279-287. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved March 21, 2023 from .

This record was imported from Economics of Education Review on March 1, 2019. Economics of Education Review is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00010-8

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Barrow, M.M. (1991). Measuring local education authority performance: a frontier approach . Economics of Education Review, 10, pp. 19-27.
  2. Callan, S.J., & Santerre, R.E. (1990). The production characteristics of local public education: a multiple product and input analysis . Southern Economic Journal, 57, pp. 468-480.
  3. Deller, S.C., & Rudnicki, E. (1993). Production efficiency in elementary education: the case of Maine public schools . Economics of Education Review, 12, pp. 45-57.
  4. Duncombe, W., Miner, J., & Ruggiero, J. (1995). Potential cost savings from school district consolidation: a case study of New York . Economics of Education Review, 14, pp. 265-283.
  5. Fox, W.F. (1981). Reviewing economies of size in education . Journal of Education Finance, 6, pp. 273-296.
  6. Geisert, G. (1990). Teacher union involvement in year-round schooling . Government Union Review, 11, pp. 30-41.
  7. Hanushek, E.A. (1986). The economics of schooling: production and efficiency in public schools . Journal of Economic Literature, 24, pp. 1141-1177.
  8. Jimenez, E. (1986). The structure of education costs: multiproduct cost functions for primary and secondary schools in Latin America . Economics of Education Review, 5, pp. 25-39.
  9. Kenny, L. (1982). Economies of scale in schooling . Economic Education Review, 2, pp. 1-24.
  10. Kumar, R. (1983). Economies of scale in school operation: evidence from Canada . Applied Economics, 15, pp. 323-340.
  11. Levin, H.M. (1974). Measuring efficiency in educational production . Public Finance Quarterly, 2, pp. 3-24.
  12. Maddala, G.S. (1992). Introduction to econometrics. New York: Macmillan.
  13. Pindyck, R.S., & Rubinfeld, D.L. (1991). Econometric models and economic forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  14. Watt, P.A. (1980). Economies of scale in schools: some evidence from the private sector . Applied Economics, 12, pp. 235-242.
  15. Woo, E. (1987). The Times poll. Year-round classes: public deeply split. Los Angeles Times, Part 1, Page 1, Column 2: Metro Desk.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References