You are here:

Curriculum reform as contested: An analysis of curriculum policy enactment in Queensland, Australia
ARTICLE

International Journal of Educational Research Volume 74, Number 1, ISSN 0883-0355 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

Abstract

This paper explores how teachers and school-based administrators at a large, low socio-economic primary school responded to policy support for a highly detailed version of the new national curriculum in Queensland, Australia. Drawing upon Pierre Bourdieu’s ‘thinking tools’ of field, habitus and capital, and recent theorising of policy enactment, the paper indicates how competing relations between different policy actors influenced how they responded to the policy enactment process. The research outlines what is described as the ‘field of policy enactment’ as a contested site with those educators with more capital more actively responding to policy prerogatives, at the same time as those with less capital were often simply managing to cope.

Citation

Hardy, I. (2015). Curriculum reform as contested: An analysis of curriculum policy enactment in Queensland, Australia. International Journal of Educational Research, 74(1), 70-81. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved September 18, 2020 from .

This record was imported from International Journal of Educational Research on March 1, 2019. International Journal of Educational Research is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.09.010

Keywords