You are here:

Assessment and Online Courses: improving practices
PROCEEDINGS

, , California State University, Bakersfield, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Phoenix, AZ, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-55-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Assessment has great potential for honing and improving online courses and enhancing student learning. This paper includes a discussion of current assessments and best practices for assessing courses, instruction/instructors, and students. The authors will share assessments they have developed and used.

Citation

Swenson, P. & Curtis, L. (2005). Assessment and Online Courses: improving practices. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2005--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 617-620). Phoenix, AZ, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 1, 2023 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Dede, C. (2004) Enabling distributed-learning communities via emerging technologies. Information Technology& Teacher Education Annual: Proceedings of SITE 2004. 3-12.
  2. Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence, New York: Bantam Books.
  3. Hawkes, M., & Romiszowski, A. (2001). Examining the reflective outcomes of asynchronous computer-mediated communication on inservice teacher development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 285-308.
  4. Maeroff, G. (2003). A Classroom of One. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan Ltd.
  5. Morrow, D. (2002). An examination of types of learner interactivity in an online professional development course. Information Technology& Teacher Education Annual: Proceedings of SITE 2002. 871-875.
  6. Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jo s sey-Bass Publishers.
  7. Parker, D. & Gemino, A. (2001, September). Inside online learning: comparing conceptual and technique learning performance in place-based and aln formats. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2). Retrieved June 24, 2002, from http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln-vol5issue2v2.htm
  8. Rosen, D., & Bloom, A. (2002). Structuring distance education programs to enhance preservice teacher preparation. Information Technology& Teacher Education Annual: Proceedings of SITE 2002. 297-298.
  9. Ravelli, B. (2000). Anonymous online teaching assessments: preliminary findings. Article accepted for publication by ERIC.. Retrieved December 20, 2004 from http://getfast.ca/Bruce_Ravelli_ERIC_Article.pdf.
  10. Rosen, D., & Bloom, A. (2002). Structuring distance education programs to enhance preservice teacher preparation. Information Technology& Teacher Education Annual: Proceedings of SITE 2002. 297-298.
  11. Reisman, S., Edge, D. & Flores, J. (Eds.) (2003). Electronic communities—current issues and best practices. Boston, MA: United States Distance Learning Association and Information Age Publishing.
  12. Willis, B. (2002). The guiding assumptions of successful distance education programs. Information Technology& Teacher Education Annual: Proceedings of SITE 2002. 326-329.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References