You are here:

Impact of One to One Programs on Student Achievement: A Review of Studies
PROCEEDING

, University of North Texas,College of Information: Learning Technologies, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

Many schools today are bringing one to one computer initiatives into the classroom. These initiative are happening but there is not a clear answer as to whether they are helping students achievement. Many studies are short-term and see very little to no improvement through qualitative data Students though overall see a change in themselves with the addition of laptops. Their attitudes and the attitudes of the teachers involved have an impact on student achievement and the success of the program. But concerns about the other elements one to one programs bring to the classroom need to be explored.

Citation

Kissel, T. (2018). Impact of One to One Programs on Student Achievement: A Review of Studies. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1582-1585). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 27, 2020 from .

© 2018 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(2).
  2. Bebell, D., & O'Dwyer, L.M. (2010). Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computing settings. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(1), 1-15.
  3. Bebell, D., & Pedulla, J. (2015). A Quantitative Investigation into the Impacts of 1: 1 iPads on Early Learner’s ELA and Math Achievement. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14, 191-215.
  4. Carter, S.P., Greenberg, K., & Walker, M.S. (2017). The impact of computer usage on academic performance: Evidence from a randomized trial at the United States Military Academy. Economics of Education Review, 56, 118-132.
  5. Crook, S., Sharma, M., & Wilson, R. (2017). Teachers’ Transition into a 1: 1 Laptop Environment: A Longitudinal Case Study of Four Science Teachers over 5 Years. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (formerly CAL-laborate International), 25(5).
  6. Davies R.S., West R.E. (2014) Technology Integration in Schools. In: Spector J., Merrill M., Elen J., Bishop M. (eds) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, New York, NY
  7. Duggan, M., Ellison, N.B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014. Pew research center, 19.
  8. Harris, J., Al-Bataibeh M. & Al-Bataineh, A. (2015). One to one technology and its effect on student academic achievement and motivation. Proceedings of Global Learn 2015, 579-584.
  9. Judge, S., Puckett, K., & Bell, S.M. (2006). Closing the digital divide: Update from the early childhood longitudinal study. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(1), 52-60.
  10. Lowther, D.L., Inan, F.A., Strahl, J.D., & Ross, S.M. (2012). Do one-to-one initiatives bridge the way to 21st century knowledge and skills?. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 1-30.
  11. Mayer, R.E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into practice, 41(4), 226-232. Miller, Nicole, "The Impact of 1:1 Laptop Environments on the English Language Arts Achievement of Fifth Grade Students from Diverse Socio-Economic Backgrounds" (2017). Doctoral Dissertations and Projects. 1524. Http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/1524 Miranda, H.P., & Russell, M. (2012). Understanding factors associated with teacher ‐directed student use of technology in elementary classrooms: A structural equation modeling approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 652-666.
  12. Penuel, W.R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of research on technology in education, 38(3), 329-348.
  13. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
  14. Rosen, Y., & Beck-Hill, D. (2012). Intertwining digital content and a one-to-one laptop environment in teaching and learning: Lessons from the time to know program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(3), 225-241.
  15. Rosen, Y., & Manny-Ikan, E. (2011). The social promise of educational technology: The case of the Time To Know program. In American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. New Orleans, Louisiana.
  16. Warschauer, M. (2005). Going one-to-one. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 34. Chicago
  17. Willocks, B., & Redmond, P. (2014). Evaluating a 1-to-1 iPad project: beyond rose coloured glasses. In Conference Proceedings of the Australian Computers in Education Conference 2014 (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 399-406). Australian Council for Computers in Education.
  18. Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., & Farkas, G. (2013). Digital writing and diversity: The effects of school laptop programs on literacy processes and outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(3), 267-299.
  19. Zuber, E.N., & Anderson, J. (2013). The initial response of secondary mathematics teachers to a one-to-one laptop program. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(2), 279-298.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read