
Developing Third-Grade Students’ Computational Thinking Skills with Educational Robotics
PROCEEDING
Charoula Angeli, Eria Makridou, University of Cyprus, Cyprus
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
The paper addresses the issue of how computational thinking can be taught to young children with the use of educational robotics using the kit LEGO WeDo Due to the young age of the students who participated in the study, computational thinking was measured in terms of four sub-skills, namely, sequencing, correspondence between actions and instructions, debugging, and flow of control Students were assigned to an experimental group and a control group The results of the study showed that educational robotics was an effective method for teaching computational thinking skills to elementary school students According to the findings, students in the experimental group outperformed the students in the control group These findings showed that, despite the short duration of the intervention, engaging children in computer programming activities with robots helped them to develop computational thinking skills
Citation
Angeli, C. & Makridou, E. (2018). Developing Third-Grade Students’ Computational Thinking Skills with Educational Robotics. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1-8). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 7, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/182493/.
© 2018 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Bers, M.U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E.R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers& Education, 72, 145-157.
- Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43.
- Lu, J.J., & Fletcher, G.H. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulleting, 41(1), 260-264.
- McCauley, R., Fitzgerald, S., Lewandowski, G., Murphy, L., Simon, B., Thomas, L., & Zander, C. (2008). Debugging: A review of the literature from an educational perspective. Computer Science Education, 18(2), 67-92.
- Mioduser, D., & Levy, S.T. (2010). Making sense by building sense: Kindergarten children’s construction and
- National Research Council. (2010). Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2011). Report of a workshop of pedagogical aspects of computational thinking. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.-7-SITE 2018-Washington, D.C., United States, March 26-30, 2018
- Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2013). Computational thinking: The developing definitions. In Proceedings of the 45th
- Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J.T. (2011). Introducing computational thinking in education courses. In the Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 465-470). Retrieved February 2016. Http://cs4edu.cs.purdue.edu/_media/sigcse11-final.pdf.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References