You are here:

STEM Teacher Efficacy in Flipped Classrooms


Journal of STEM Education Volume 18, Number 4, ISSN 1557-5284 Publisher: Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE)


The flipped classroom instructional model continues to grow in adoption and use in K-12 classrooms. Although there are an increasing number of studies into the implementation of the flipped classroom, there is limited empirical research into its effectiveness and even fewer into the educational, psychological, and theoretical constructs underlying the practice. This study examines flipped classroom instructional model through the lens of teacher efficacy. In this case study, a transcendental phenomenological approach is used to describe the “essence\u201d of the flipped classroom model as experienced by the teachers using it in the classroom. This research adds to the literature, a framework from which to more deeply analyze those themes that contribute to the successes of the teachers studied.


Kelly, D. & Denson, C. (2017). STEM Teacher Efficacy in Flipped Classrooms. Journal of STEM Education, 18(4),. Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE). Retrieved December 15, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Armor, D., Conry-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., Thompson, V.M. (1976). Analysis
  2. Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in Changing Societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  4. Barriball, K.L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: A discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(2), 328-335.
  5. Berman, P., McLaughlin, M.W., Bass, G., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change. Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation: Vol. VII. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
  6. Bishop, J.L., & Verleger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented in the
  7. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  8. Creswell, J.W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  9. Dellinger, A.B., Bobbett, J.J., Olivier, D.F., & Ellett, C.D. (2008). Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 751-766.
  10. Fink, A. (2003). The Survey Handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M.H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
  12. Hoy, A.W. (2000). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  13. Hoy, W.K., & Woolfolk, A.E. (1993). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The elementary school journal, 93(4), 355-372.
  14. Lage, M.J., Platt, G.J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
  15. Melnick, S.A., & Meister, D.G. (2008). A comparison of beginning and experienced teachers’ concerns. Educational Research Quarterly, 31(3), 40-56.
  16. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  17. Protheroe, N. (2008). Teacher Efficacy: What Is It and Does It Matter? Principal, 87(5), 42-45.
  18. Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(8), 1-5.
  19. Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28.
  20. Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
  21. Skaalvik, E.M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611-625.
  22. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W.A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. Doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1
  23. Vagle, M.D. (2014). Crafting Phenomenological Research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press. Daniel Kelly is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Department of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education at North

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact