You are here:

The Role of a Mentor Teacher’s TPACK in Preservice Teachers’ Intentions to Integrate Technology

, The Ohio State University, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 25, Number 4, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

A wealth of research has focused on the technology integration behaviors of preservice teachers, with much of that literature centering on technology and methods coursework within teacher education programs. However, less emphasis has been placed on understanding the impact of field placement observations on a preservice teacher’s technology integration intentions. This study investigates how witnessing a mentor teacher utilizing technology in the field impacts an early preservice teacher’s intentions to use technology in future practice, and how factors such as the mentor teacher’s TPACK might moderate that effect, with the perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of observed tools serving as potential mediators. The findings indicate that a mentor teacher’s TPACK conditionally impacts how technology observations affect early preservice teachers’ intentions to personally use technology. For teachers with high TPACK scores, preservice teachers wanted to use technology more as they saw their mentor teachers using it more frequently. The reverse was true for teachers with low TPACK scores. The findings suggest that a mentor teacher’s self-described ability to teach his or her subject with technology plays an important role in how preservice teachers make personal judgments about their own technology usage. The perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of technology by the preservice teacher did not, however, mediate the influence of the mentor teachers.

Citation

Nelson, M. (2017). The Role of a Mentor Teacher’s TPACK in Preservice Teachers’ Intentions to Integrate Technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 449-473. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved October 22, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers& Education, 52(1), 154–168.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.
  3. Chau, P.Y.K. (1996). An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers (English). Information& Management, 30(6), 269–280.
  4. Cheung, A.C., & Slavin, R.E. (2011). The effectiveness of education technology for enhancing reading achievement: A meta-analysis. Center for Research and Reform in Education. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED527572
  5. Cheung, A.C., & Slavin, R.E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113.
  6. Davis F.D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fred_Davis2/publication/35465050_A_technology_acceptance_model_for_empirically_testing_new_enduser_information_systems__theory_and_results_/links/0c960519fbaddf3ba7000000.pdf
  7. Dong, Y., Chai, C.S., Sang, G.-Y., Koh, J.H.L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2015). Exploring the profiles and interplays of pre-service and in-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in China. Educational Technology& Society, 18(1), 158–169.
  8. Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.
  9. Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers& Education, 59(2), 423–435.
  10. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  11. Graham, C.R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers& Education, 57(3), 1953–1960.
  12. Greene, B.A. (2015). Measuring cognitive engagement with self-report scales: Reflections from over 20 years of research. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 14–30.
  13. Harel, O., Zimmerman, R., & Dekhtyar, O. (2008). Approaches to the handling of missing data in communication research. In A.F. Hayes, M.D. Slater, & L.B. Snyder (Eds.), The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Retrieved from http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=3032415 Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416.
  14. Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
  15. Hu, P.J.-H., Clark, T.H., & Ma, W.W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information& Management, 41(2), 227–241.
  16. Hutchison, A., & Reinking, D. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the United States. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 312–333.
  17. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A.L. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 279–305.
  18. Koh, J.H., & Divaharan, H. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-developing instructional model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35–58.
  19. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information& Management, 40(3), 191–204.
  20. Ma, W.W., Andersson, R., & Streith, K.-O. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 387–395.
  21. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. Https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9620.2006.00684.xMouza,C.(2016).Developingand assessing TPACK among pre-service teachers. Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators, 169.
  22. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.
  23. Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H.B., & Ayas, C. (2015). Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 241–263.
  24. Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information& Management, 44(1), 90–103.
  25. Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Shin, T.S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
  26. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
  27. Tamim, R.M., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P.C., & Schmid, R.F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning a second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28.
  28. Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of preservice teachers. Computers& Education, 52(2), 302–312.
  29. Teo, T. (2010). A path analysis of pre-service teachers’ attitudes to computer use: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an educational context. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(1), 65–79.
  30. Teo, T. (2012). Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: an integration of the technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(1), 3–18.
  31. Teo, T., Lee, C.B., Chai, C.S., & Wong, S.L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers& Education, 53(3), 1000–1009.
  32. Teo, T., Wong, S.L., & Chai, C.S. (2008). ACross-cultural Examination of the Intention to Use Technology between Singaporean and Malaysian preservice Teachers: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Educational Technology& Society, 11(4), 265–280.
  33. Wang, L., Ertmer, P.A., & Newby, T.J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231–250.
  34. Zirkel, S., Garcia, J.A., & Murphy, M.C. (2015). Experience-sampling research methods and their potential for education research. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 7–16.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.