You are here:

Pedagogical Foundation and Significance of the ICT Studies for the Teacher Trainees in Their Studies
PROCEEDING

, , University of Jyväskylä/Kokkola university consortium Chydenius, Finland

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, TX, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-27-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

Finnish national core curriculum (2014) highlights the important of ICT. A strong theoretical model and pedagogical understanding are needed for the innovative teaching use of technology. In this study we describe theoretical background of our ICT education and development of teacher trainees ICT-skills and pedagogical understanding. The students' study module is based on Mishra and Koehler’s TPACK-model (2006).The data was collected during two years from two student groups (N=52). Results indicated that, in general, the studies have made it possible to acquire the technological competence and to combine the pedagogical knowledge with the technology. The results of the study clearly state that the education supports understanding the use of ICT. The results show that understanding the pedagogical use of technology has emerged. Technical support given by the ICT and the possibility to adapt ICT that is offered in all the study modules have clearly been useful to the students.

Citation

Lähdesmäki, S. & Valli, P. (2017). Pedagogical Foundation and Significance of the ICT Studies for the Teacher Trainees in Their Studies. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2381-2390). Austin, TX, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 19, 2019 from .

© 2017 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Balanskat, A. & Sali, L. (2009). Step by STEPS, the ICT picture in European primary schools starts taking shape, European Schoolnet. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/yft7nsa
  2. CICERO (2008) Tieto-ja viestintäteknologian hyödyntäminen opetuksessa ja opiskelussa. Retrieved from http://www.cicero.fi/files/Cicero/site/CICERO_ICT-selvitysraportti.pdf
  3. Consultative Committee of Everyday Information Society (2009). (Arjen tietoyhteiskunnan neuvottelukunta). Tietoja viestintätekniikka koulun arjessa. Väliraportti. Retrieved from http://tiny.cc/ICT_valiraportti [in Finnish]
  4. Consultative Committee of Everyday Information Society (2010). (Arjen tietoyhteiskunnan neuvottelukunta). National Plan for Educational Use of Information and Communications Technology. Retrieved from http://www.edu.fi/download/135308_TVT_opetuskayton_suunnitelma_Eng.pdf [in English]
  5. Council of Sate (2010). (Valtionneuvosto). Tuottava ja uudistuva Suomi-Digitaalinen agenda vuosille 2011-2020. Selonteko Eduskunnalle 26.11.2010.
  6. European Commission. (2013). Survey of schools: ICT in education benchmarking access, use and attitudes to technology in Europe’s schools. European Commission-IP/13/341 19/04/2013.
  7. [in Finnish]Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of research ontTechnology in education, 41(4), 393-416. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ844273.pdf
  8. Husu, J. & Toom, A. (2016). Opettajat ja opettajankoulutus – suuntia tulevaan. Opetus-ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2016:33. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.fi/export/sites/default/OPM/Julkaisut/2016/liitteet/okm33.pdf [in Finnish]
  9. Koehler, M.J. & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of computing in teacher education, 21(3), 94–102.
  10. Koehler, M.J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is kechnological pedagogical content Knowledge? Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/general/what-is-technological-pedagogicalcontent-knowledge/ Kumpulainen, K. & Lipponen, L. (2010). Koulu 3.0-Kuinka teemme visiosta totta? In K. Vähähyyppä (ed.) Koulu 3.0. Opetushallitus. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/download/121845_koulu_3.0.pdf
  11. Kurt,G., Akyel, A., Kocoglu, Z. & Mishra, P. (2014). TPACK in practice: A qualitative study on technology integrated lesson planning and implementation of Turkish pre-service teachers of English. ELT Research Journal, 3(3),153-166.
  12. Lähdesmäki, S.(2016). Getting familiar with ICT. (TVT tutuksi). Retriewed from https://itunes.apple.com/fi/book/kirjan-nimi/id1073420651?l=fi & Mt=11 [in Finnish]
  13. Martinovic, D. & Zhang, Z. (2012). Situating ICT in the teacher education program: Overcoming challenges, fulfilling expectations. Teaching and teacher education 28 (3): 461–469.
  14. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  15. Meisalo, V., Lavonen, J., Sormunen, K. & Vesisenaho, M. (2010). ICT in Finnish initial teacher education. Country report for the OECD/CERI new millenium learners project INCT in initial teacher training. Reports of the ministry of education and culture, Finland 2010:25
  16. Meriläinen, M., Piispanen, M. & Valli, R. (2014). Adapting iPads to primary school teacher education. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez& I. Candel Torres. ICERI2014 7th International conference of education, research and innovation IATED, 3247-3254.
  17. Ministery of Education and Culture (2012). (Opetus-ja kulttuuriministeriö). Koulutuksen tietoyhteiskuntakehittäminen 2020. Parempaa laatua, tehokkaampaa yhteistyötä ja avoimempaa vuorovaikutusta. Opetus-ja kulttuuriministeriön työryhmämuistioita ja selvityksiä 2010:12, Helsinki. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.fi/export/sites/default/OPM/Julkaisut/2010/liitteet/okmtr12.pdf?lang=fi [in Finnish]
  18. Myllyviita, A. & Lavonen, J. (2014). Tieto-ja viestintätekniikka opettajankoulutuksessa. Teoksessa MahlamäkiKultanen, S., Lauriala A., Karjalainen A., Rautiainen A., Räkköläinen M., Helin E., Pohjonen P. & Nyyssölä, K. (Eds.), Opettajankoulutuksen tilannekatsaus (pp. 116-125). Opetushallitus. Retrieved from
  19. Pedro, F. (2005). Comparing traditional and ICT-enriched university teaching methods: Evidence from two empirical studies. Higher education in Europe, 30(3-4), 399-411.
  20. Quakrim-Soivio, N., Rinkinen, A. & Karjalainen, T. (2015) Tulevaisuuden peruskoulu. Opetus-ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 8:2015. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.fi/export/sites/default/OPM/Julkaisut/2015/liitteet/okm8.pdf?lang=fi [in Finnish]
  21. Rikala, J., Hiltunen, L. & Vesisenaho, M. (2014). Teachers attitudes, competence, and readiness to adopt mobile learning approaches. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in education conference proceedings (pp. 2529-2536).
  22. Schulman, L.S.(1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Survey of schools: ICT in Education. Benchmarking access, use and attitudes to technology in Europe’s schools. 2013. Retrieved from http://www.eun.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=9be81a75-c868-4558-a777-862ecc8162a4&groupId=43887 Taajamo,M., Puhakka, E. & Välijärvi, J. (2015). Opetuksen ja oppimisen kansainvälinen tutkimus Talis 2013. Tarkastelun kohteena alakoulun ja toisen asteen oppilaitosten opettajat ja rehtorit. Opetus-ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja 2015:4 Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-263-332-3 [in Finnish]
  23. Valli, R. (2015). Johdatus tilastolliseen tutkimukseen. Juva: Ps-kustannus.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Slides