You are here:

A Three-pronged Conceptual Framework for Developing an Effective and Sustainable K-12 Educational Technology Environment
PROCEEDING

, New Jersey City University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, TX, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-27-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Abstract: The world that our students live in continues to modernize and evolve at a rapid pace. To maintain pace with changes in technology, we tend to find a revolving door of new educational technology systems and initiatives with little evidence of success. This paper presents a three-pronged conceptual framework for developing a K-12 educational technology environment that promotes effective and sustainable use of monetary and operational resources. Following an exploration of the effects of educational technology investments, ever-changing technologies, and understanding of user needs, three areas of focus are presented to afford school administrators and educational technology managers with guidance and explanations to develop an effective and sustainable K-12 educational technology environment.

Citation

Davis, D. (2017). A Three-pronged Conceptual Framework for Developing an Effective and Sustainable K-12 Educational Technology Environment. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1099-1104). Austin, TX, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 7, 2023 from .

© 2017 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Al-Zaidiyeen, N.J., Mei, L.L., & Fook, F.S. (2010). Teachers' attitudes and levels of technology use in classrooms: The case of jordan schools. International Education Studies, 3(2), 211.
  2. Bakir, I. (2015). Throwing money at education technology Isn’t the answer [opinion] Retrieved from// www.noodle.com/articles
  3. Barshay, J. (2014). Why hoboken is throwing away all of its student laptops. Retrieved from: // www.noodle.com/articles Bhattacherjee, A., Anol Bhattacherjee, & G. Premkumar. (06). Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 229; 229-254; 254.
  4. Boyle, T., Cook, J., Windle, R., Wharrad, H., Leeder, D., & Alton, R. (2006). An agile method for developing learning objects. Paper Presentation, ASCILITE Conference, Sydney, Australia, December, 3-6.
  5. Creswell, J. (2013). In Knight V. (Ed.), Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE
  6. Dweck, C. (2015). Carol dweck revisits the'growth mindset'. Education Week,
  7. Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
  8. Fowler, M., & Highsmith, J. (2001). The agile manifesto. Software Development, 9(8), 28-35.
  9. Frese, R., & Sauter, V. (2003). Project success and failure. Retrieved from https://www.expertbase.org
  10. Heick, T. (2012). 5 ways rapid technology change impacts education. Retrieved from http://www.teachthought.com/
  11. Johnson, D. (2011). Stretching your technology dollar. (No. 4). Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/.
  12. Kaisti, M., Mujunen, T., Mäkilä, T., Rantala, V., & Lehtonen, T. (2014). Agile principles in the embedded system development. Paper presented at the International Conference on Agile Software Development, 16-31.
  13. Kleiman, G.M. (2000). Myths and realities about technology in K-12 schools. Leadership and the New Technologies, 14(10),
  14. Lannon, R. (2015). Four steps to align your organization to its strategic plan. Retrieved from https://www.projecttimes.com/
  15. Loranger, H. (2016). The negativity bias in user experience. Retrieved from www.nngroup.com/articles/negativity-bias
  16. Mccandless, J. (2015). U.S. Education institutions spend $6.6 billion on IT in 2015. Retrieved from www.centerdigitaled.com Rehmat, A.P., & Bailey, J.M. (12). Technology integration in a science classroom: Preservice teachers' perceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 744; 744.
  17. Reiser, R.A. (2007). What field did you say you were in. Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology
  18. Romiszowski, A.J. (2016). Designing instructional systems: Decision making in course planning and curriculum design.
  19. Salend, S.J. (2015). Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective, differentiated and reflective practices Pearson.
  20. Schaller, R.R. (1997). Moore's law: Past, present and future. Spectrum, IEEE, 34(6), 52-59.
  21. Senge, P.M. (2014). Creating the schools of the future: Education for a sustainable society. Creating a Sustainable and Desirable Future: Insights from, 45, 321-329.
  22. Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections