The preferred learning modes of online graduate students
ARTICLE
Olabisi Kuboni, University of the West Indies Open Campus
IRRODL Volume 14, Number 3, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press
Abstract
This paper reports on a research project aimed at identifying the preferred approaches to learning of mature students in an online graduate programme. Interest in this issue was generated by the positions taken by certain theorists who argue for less focus on interaction and collaboration as the basis for learning in the online environment. They contend that the learner as an individual should be acknowledged. A questionnaire, operationalizing four learning modes, was used to solicit responses from graduate students. The modes were independent learning, instrumental learning, interactive learning, and collaborative learning. Factor analysis confirmed the four as student preferred learning modes. In addition it allowed for the emergence of specific attributes of each. While instrumental learning emerged as a strong factor, the most dominant construct emerging was a dimension of collaborative learning. It is envisaged that the findings of the study can inform the design of online teaching-learning strategies for this category of students.
Citation
Kuboni, O. (2013). The preferred learning modes of online graduate students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 228-250. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171612/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Anderson, T. (2008). Social software technologies in distance education: Maximizing learning freedoms. In T. Evans, M. Haughey& D. Murphy (Eds.), International handbook of distance education (pp. 167-184). Bedfordshire, UK: Emerald
- Asunka, S. (2008). Online learning in higher education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Ghanaian students’ experiences and perceptions. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org.
- Candy, P.C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
- Cookson, P., & Chang, Y. (1995). The multidimensional audio-conferencing classification system (MACS). The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(3), 18-36.
- Daniel, J.S., & Marquis, C. (1988). Interaction and independence: Getting the mixture right. In D. Stewart, D. Keegan& B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance education: International perspectives (pp. 339-359). London: Routledge.
- Den Exeter, K., Rowe, S., Boyd, W., & Lloyd, D. (2012). Using Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative learning in distance education– case studies from an Australian university. Future Internet, 4, 216-237.
- Devos, A. (2002). Gender, work and workplace learning. In F. Reeve, M. Cartwright& R. Edwards (Eds.), Supporting lifelong learning, Vol. 2. (pp. 51-63). New York:
- Duffy, T.M., & Jonassen, D.H. (1991). New implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, 31(5), 7-11.
- Gray, R. (1996). Archetypal explorations: An integrative approach to human behaviour. New York: Routledge. Vol 14| No 3 July/13 The Preferred Learning Modes of Online Graduate Students Kuboni
- Harasim, L., Hiltz, S.R., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1995). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
- Haughey, M., & Anderson, T. (1998). Networked learning: The pedagogy of the internet. Montreal: Cheneliere/McGraw-Hill.
- Haythornthwaite, C. (2006). Facilitating collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 7-24.
- Hendricks, N. (2012). An e-learning collaborative environment: Learning within a masters in education programme. International Journal on E-Learning,11(1), 39-53.
- Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A.R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing.The Najadeen papers (pp. 117-136). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
- Hong, S., & Jung, I. (2011).The distance learner competencies: A three-phased empirical approach. Education Technology Research and Development, 59, 21-42.
- Hyland, T., & Merrill, B. (2003). The changing face of further education: Lifelong learning, inclusion and community values in further education. New York: Routledge Falmer.
- Jahng, N. (2012). An investigation of collaboration processes in an online course: How do small groups develop over time? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org
- Jegede, O. (1991). Constructivism and research in distance education. Open Forum: Distance Education and Open Learning, 1(1), 5-9.
- Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B.(1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7-26.
- Kuboni, O. (2009). From lecturer to course coordinator: Redefining the role of the university academic for teaching and learning in a distribiuted learning environment. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 138-148.
- Merriam, S.B., Caffarella, R.S. & Baumgartner, L.M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd. Ed). California: Jossey-Bass.
- Moore, M. (1973). Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 44(12), 661-679.
- Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
- Nichani, M.R. (2000). Learning through social interactions (online communities). Elearningpost.com. Retrieved from http://www.elearningpost.com
- Postle, G. (2002). Emergence of fourth generation technologies. Retrieved from file:///G|/Projects/web/e-jist/site/docs/html2002/gPos.html
- Rovai, A. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org
- Rust, C. (2009). Assessment standards: a potential role for subject networks. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sports and Tourism Education, 8(1).
- Ryle, A., & Cumming, K. (2007). Reflections on engagement in online learning communities. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 3(3), 35-46.
- Shackleford, J., & Maxwell, M. (2012). Sense of community in graduate online education: contribution of learner to learner interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 228 – 249. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org
- Wedemeyer, C.A. (1975). Implications of open learning for independent study. Paper presented at the ICCE Conference, Brighton, United Kingdom.
- Yang, Y-F., Yeh, H-C., & Wong, W-K. (2010). The influence of social interaction on meaning construction in a virtual community. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 287-306.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
The preferred learning modes of online graduate students
Olabisi Kuboni, University of the West Indies Open Campus
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 14, No. 3 (Jun 03, 2013) pp. 228–250
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.