Designing for Productive Failure
Journal of the Learning Sciences Volume 21, Number 1, ISSN 1050-8406
In this article, we describe the design principles undergirding "productive failure" (PF; M. Kapur, 2008). We then report findings from an ongoing program of research on PF in mathematical problem solving in 3 Singapore public schools with significantly different mathematical ability profiles, ranging from average to lower ability. In the 1st study, 7th-grade mathematics students from intact classes experienced 1 of 2 conditions: (a) PF, in which students collaboratively solved complex problems on average speed "without" any instructional support or scaffolds up until a teacher-led consolidation; or (b) direct instruction (DI), in which the teacher provided strong instructional support, scaffolding, and feedback. Findings suggested that although PF students generated a diversity of linked representations and methods for solving the complex problems, they were ultimately unsuccessful in their problem-solving efforts. Yet despite seemingly failing in their problem-solving efforts, PF students significantly outperformed DI students on the well-structured and complex problems on the posttest. They also demonstrated greater representation flexibility in solving average speed problems involving graphical representations, a representation that was not targeted during instruction. The 2nd and 3rd studies, conducted in schools with students of significantly lower mathematical ability, largely replicated the findings of the 1st study. Findings and implications of PF for theory, design of learning, and future research are discussed. (Contains 8 tables, 4 figures and 2 footnotes.)
Kapur, M. & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for Productive Failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45-83.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
J. Elizabeth Richey, Carnegie Mellon University, United States; Juan Miguel L. Andres-Bray, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Michael Mogessie, Carnegie Mellon University, United States; Richard Scruggs & Juliana M.A.L. Andres, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Jon R. Star, Harvard University, United States; Ryan S. Baker, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Bruce M. McLaren, Carnegie Mellon University, United States
Computers & Education Vol. 139, No. 1 (October 2019) pp. 173–190
Edwin Creely & Michael Henderson, Monash University, Australia; Danah Henriksen, Arizona State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2019 (Mar 18, 2019) pp. 1403–1411
Katharina Loibl & Timo Leuders
Learning and Instruction Vol. 62, No. 1 (August 2019) pp. 1–10
Mary Rose O.P.
Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning Vol. 22, No. 2 (Dec 13, 2018) pp. 32–48
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.