#
Exploring Social Equity Aspects in Integrating Technology in Primary Mathematics Education
PROCEEDINGS

## Dorian Stoilescu

International Conferences on Education Technologies (ICEduTech) and Sustainability, Technology and Education (STE),

## Abstract

This research focus on aspects of equity related to the introduction of using technology in classrooms. Technology has the potential to support mathematics pedagogy with visual representations and offer modelling and simulation facilities, increasing the creativity of the learning and teaching processes (Kaput, Ness, & Hoyles, 2008; Stoilescu 2008). Introducing technology in mathematics is not always helpful. Sometimes it improves the instruction and equity and sometimes it increase inequity and the earning knowledge gap. For instance, by introducing ICT in classrooms, mathematics pedagogy is changed, as the devices involved can be used to explain, to test, and to give feedback to students. This is because ICT offers an environment that allows a dynamic context and lets instruction become more engaging and interactive. As well, technology could be used in non-creative ways in which students are only kept busy so that the knowledge accumulated is at minimum. This qualitative research study will select four exemplary teachers to discuss ways of improving technology in classrooms. Situations where introducing technology in mathematics classrooms will be discusses to see their relevance and whether they are helpful and fair or not. [For the complete proceedings, see ED557181.]

## Citation

Stoilescu, D. (2014). Exploring Social Equity Aspects in Integrating Technology in Primary Mathematics Education. Presented at International Conferences on Education Technologies (ICEduTech) and Sustainability, Technology and Education (STE) 2014. Retrieved March 31, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/158337/.

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

### Keywords

## References

View References & Citations Map- Assude, T., Buteau, C., Forgasz, H. (2010). Factors Influencing Implementation of Technology-Rich Mathematics Curriculum and Practices. New ICMI Study Series Volume 13, 405-419.
- Aggarwal, V. (2011). Educational Technology. Pinnacle Technology.
- Apple, M.W. (1988). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York: Routledge.
- Apple, M.W. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412–431.
- Atweh, B. (2011). Quality and equity in mathematics education as ethical issues. In B. Atweh, ed. Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 63-75). Springer Netherlands.
- Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S.K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (4th edition). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Cobbold, T. (2010). An analysis of government and private school expenditure and the challenge of education disadvantage in Australia. Research Paper November 2010. Retrieved July 7 2013 from www.saveourschools.com.au/file_download/53
- Ernest, P. (2002). Empowerment in mathematics education. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 15 (1), 1-16.
- Ernest, P. (2004).What is the philosophy of mathematics education? Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 18(1).Retrieved from http://people.exeter.ac.uk/PErnest/pome18/PhoM_%20for_ICME_04.htm
- Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. New York: The New Press.
- Gates, P., & Jorgensen. R. (2009). Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 161–170.
- Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. Routledge, New York.
- Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: examining the “voice” of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344–369.
- Jorgensen, R., Gates, P., & Roper, V. (2013). Structural exclusion through school mathematics: using Bourdieu to understand mathematics as a social practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1-19.
- Kaput, J., Hegedus, S., & Lesh, R. (2007). Technology becoming infrastructural in mathematics education. In R.A. Lesh, E. Hamilton& J. Kaput (eds.) Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 173-192). Mahwah, NJ:
- Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Merriam S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case studies in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass publishers.
- Patton, M.Q. (2005). Qualitative research. New York: John Wiley& Sons.
- Stoilescu, D. (2009). Is educational technology useful to mathematics teachers activists? Acta Didactica Napocensia, 2(3), 85-94.
- Stoilescu, D. & McDougall, D. (2011). Gender digital divide and challenges in undergraduate computer science programs. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(1), 308-333.
- Tutak, F., Bondy, E. & Adams, T.L. (2011). Critical pedagogy for critical mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42 (1), 65–74.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References