A Meta-Analysis of Blended Learning and Technology Use in Higher Education: From the General to the Applied ARTICLE
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Volume 26, Number 1, ISSN 1042-1726
This paper serves several purposes. First and foremost, it is devoted to developing a better understanding of the effectiveness of blended learning (BL) in higher education. This is achieved through a meta-analysis of a sub-collection of comparative studies of BL and classroom instruction (CI) from a larger systematic review of technology integration (Schmid et al. in "Comput Educ" 72:271-291, 2014). In addition, the methodology of meta-analysis is described and illustrated by examples from the current study. The paper begins with a summary of the experimental research on distance education (DE) and online learning (OL), encapsulated in meta-analyses that have been conducted since 1990. Then it introduces the Bernard et al. ("Rev Educ Res" 74(3):379-439, 2009) meta-analysis, which attempted to alter the DE research culture of always comparing DE/OL with CI by examining three forms of "interaction treatments" (i.e., student-student, student-teacher, student-content) within DE, using the theoretical framework of Moore ("Am J Distance Educ" 3(2):1-6, 1989) and Anderson ("Rev Res Open Distance Learn" 4(2):9-14, 2003). The rest of the paper revolves around the general steps and procedures (Cooper in "Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach," 4th edn, SAGE, Los Angeles, CA, 2010) involved in conducting a meta-analysis. This section is included to provide researchers with an overview of precisely how meta-analyses can be used to respond to more nuanced questions that speak to underlying theory and inform practice–in other words, not just answers to the "big questions." In this instance, we know that technology has an overall positive impact on learning (g[superscript +] = +0.35, p < 0.01, Tamim et al. in "Rev Educ Res" 81(3):4-28, 2011), but the sub-questions addressed here concern BL interacting with technology in higher education. The results indicate that, in terms of achievement outcomes, BL conditions exceed CI conditions by about one-third of a standard deviation (g[superscript +] = 0.334, k = 117, p < 0.001) and that the kind of computer support used (i.e., cognitive support vs. content/presentational support) and the presence of one or more interaction treatments (e.g., student-student/-teacher/-content interaction) serve to enhance student achievement. We examine the empirical studies that yielded these outcomes, work through the methodology that enables evidence-based decision-making, and explore how this line of research can improve pedagogy and student achievement.
Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R.F., Tamim, R.M. & Abrami, P.C. (2014). A Meta-Analysis of Blended Learning and Technology Use in Higher Education: From the General to the Applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87-122. Retrieved November 15, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/154133/.
Ron Owston, York University, Canada
International Journal on E-Learning Vol. 17, No. 1 (January 2018) pp. 65–83
Online Learning in the 30 Community Colleges of the State University of New York: Differences in Outcomes between Classroom and Online Coursework
Peter Shea, University at Albany, SUNY, United States; Temi Bidjerano, Furman University, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2017 (Jun 20, 2017) pp. 1192–1198
Francisco Vargas Madriz & Norma Nocente, University of Alberta, Canada
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2016 (Nov 14, 2016) pp. 1443–1448
Susan W Bontly, Cynthia Gomez, Samar Khalil & Tahani Fouad Mansour, NMSU, College of Education, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 1862–1870
Technology Integration in Postsecondary Education: A Summary of Findings of a Series of Meta-Analytical Research
Eugene Borokhovski, Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance (CSLP), Concordia University, Canada; Robert M. Bernard, CSLP, Concordia University, Canada; Rana Tamim, College of Education, Zayed University, United Arab Emirates; Richard F. Schmid, CSLP, Concordia University, Canada
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2015 (Jun 22, 2015) pp. 1764–1774
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.