You are here:

Zaption: A Platform to Support Teaching, and Learning about Teaching, with Video

, , , University of California

Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society Volume 11, Number 2, ISSN 1826-6223 e-ISSN 1826-6223 Publisher: Italian e-Learning Association


Digital video has exploded on the web, and many assume it will play a major role in education in the future. Just watching a video, however, does not necessarily lead to learning. Realizing the potential of video for learning will require new technologies that make video interactive, engage learners, and enable video to be embedded into routines of teaching. Zaption, a new video learning platform, is one such technology. In this article we describe the platform, and then discuss its potential for teaching, and for learning about teaching, with video.


Stigler, J., Geller, E. & Givvin, K. (2015). Zaption: A Platform to Support Teaching, and Learning about Teaching, with Video. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11(2),. Italian e-Learning Association. Retrieved February 16, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Bjork, E.L., & Bjork, R.A. (2011), Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society, 56-64.
  2. Bradshaw, G. (2005, January), Invention and artificial intelligence. In Discovery Science (pp. 1-13). Berlin, Springer.
  3. Bryk A.S., Gomez L.M., Grunow A. (2011), Getting Ideas Into Action: Building Networked Improvement Communities in Education, URL : Ingnetworked-improvement-communities-education/ (accessed on 8th May 2015).
  4. Clark, R.E. (1994), Media will never influence learning. Educational technology research and development, 42(2), 21-29.
  5. Chi, M.T. (2009), Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73-105.
  6. Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D.A. (2007), The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 1, 371-404.
  7. Kenney, C. (2008), The best practice: How the new quality movement is transforming medicine. New York, Public Affairs.
  8. Kintsch, W. (1988), The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructionintegration model. Psychological review, 95(2), 163.
  9. Kintsch, W. (1994), Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49(4), 294.
  10. Langley, G.J., Moen, R., Nolan, K.M., Nolan, T.W., Norman, C.L., & Provost, L.P. (2009), The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. San Francisco, John Wiley& Sons.
  11. Mayer, R.E. (2009), Multimedia Learning (2nd Ed.). New York, Cambridge University Press.
  12. Shute, V.J. (2008), Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1), 153-189.
  13. Szpunar, K.K., Khan, N.Y., & Schacter, D.L. (2013), Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(16), 6313-6317.
  14. Wisher, R.A., & Curnow, C.K. (2003), Video-based instruction in distance learning: From motion pictures to the Internet. Handbook of distance education, 315-330.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Online Physics laboratory for University courses

    Daniela Amendola & Cristina Miceli, Italy

    Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society Vol. 12, No. 3 (Jun 22, 2016)

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact