You are here:

Cultural Variations in E-Learning – A Case Study on Medical Training

, , Graz University of Technology, Austria ; , Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland ; , EmpowerTheUser, Ireland ; , Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland ; , Graz University of Technology, Austria

International Journal on E-Learning Volume 16, Number 1, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

E-learning makes educational resources available to learners spread all over the world, resulting in a greater diversity of learners. Adaptation and personalisation aim at providing appropriate learning opportunities to users with diverse needs and preferences. Apart from knowledge, goals, motivation, etc. learners’ cultural background is becoming increasingly relevant for user modelling and adaptation. For meaningful culturally-aware design and adaptation of learning systems a sound understanding of the relevance of culture in e-learning is needed. This paper presents a case study investigating the cultural dimension in a concrete e-learning application for medical training. We examined cultural variations regarding self-regulated learning and metacognition, the use of smiley symbols for expressing emotions, social networks use, and user attitudes towards utilising social digital traces for personalising learning experiences. The analysed data stem from 95 medical students, trained in an experiential simulator with affective metacognitive scaffolding. Results revealed differences in the perception of how helpful scaffolding prompts were, in the ways to express emotions, and in the acceptance of social data mining. However, participants did not differ with respect to learning performance or effort. Overall, our study provides indications on potentially relevant aspects for building cultural intelligence into e-learning systems towards a culturally-aware learning support.

Citation

Steiner, C.M., Wesiak, G., Moore, A., Dagger, D., Conlan, O. & Albert, D. (2017). Cultural Variations in E-Learning – A Case Study on Medical Training. International Journal on E-Learning, 16(1), 81-98. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 21, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Abel, A., Celik, I., Hauff, C., Hollink, L., & Houben, G.-J. (2011). U-Sem: Semantic enrichment, user modeling and mining of usage data on the social web. In International Workshop on Usage Analysis and the Web of Data (USEWOD2011).
  2. Bann, E.Y. & Bryson, J.J. (2013). Measuring cultural relativity of emotional valence and arousal using semantic clustering and Twitter. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1809-1814). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  3. Blanchard, E.G. (2010). Adaptation-oriented culturally-aware tutoring systems: When adaptive instructional technologies meet intercultural education. In H. Song& T.T. Kidd (Eds.), The handbook of research on human performance and instructional technology (pp. 413-440). Hershey: IGI Global.
  4. Brusilovsky, P. & Peylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and intelligent Web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 159-172.
  5. Cheng, Z., Caverlee, J., & Lee, K. (2010). You are where you tweet: a content-based approach to geo-locating Twitter users. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 759-768). ACM.
  6. Chiu, M.M., Chow, B.W.-Y., & Mcbridge-Chang, C. (2007). Universals and specifics in learning strategies: Explaining adolescent mathematics, science, and reading achievements across 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 344365.
  7. Felder, R.M. & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the Index of Learning Styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21, 103-112.
  8. Gao, Q., Abel, F., Houben, G.-J., & Yu, Y. (2012). A comparative study of users’ microblogging behaviour on Sina Weibo and Twitter. In J. Masthoff et al. (Eds.), UMAP 2012, LNCS vol. 7379 (pp. 88-101). Berlin: Springer.
  9. Güss, C.D. & Wiley, B. (2009). Metacognition of problem-solving strategies in Brazil, India, and the United States. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 7, 1-25.
  10. Gutiérrez, K.D. & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19-25.
  11. Haag, M., Duan, Y., & Mathews, B. (2007). Knowledge development in e-Learning environments: Across-cultural perspective. In B. Martins& D. Remenyi (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM 2007) vol. 1 (pp. 391-397). Reading: Academic Conferences Limited.
  12. Hartman, H.J. (2002). Developing students’ metacognitive knowledge and strategies. In H.J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 33-68). Dordrecht:
  13. Hofstede, G.H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
  14. Jackson, L.A. & Wang, J.-L. (2013). Cultural differences in social networking site use: A comparative study of China and the United States. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 910-921.
  15. Jackson, T., Mackenzie, J., & Hobfoll, S.E. (2000). Communal aspects of self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 275-300). San Diego: Academic Press.
  16. Kashima, Y. (2000). Conceptions of culture and person for psychology. Journal of Crosscultural Psychology, 31, 14-32.
  17. Lewis, M., Takai-Kawakami, K., Kawakami, K., & Sullivan, M.W. (2010). Cultural differences in emotional responses to success and failure. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 34, 53-61.
  18. Lundeberg, M. & Mohan, L. (2009). Context matters. Gender and cross-cultural differences in confidence. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Graesser, A.C. (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 221-239). New York: Routledge.
  19. Matsumoto, D. (2009). Culture and emotional expression. In C.Y. Chiu, Y.Y., Hong, S. Shavitt, R.S. Wyer, (Eds.), Problems and solutions in cross-cultural theory, research, and application (pp. 271-287). New York: Psychology Press.
  20. McLoughlin, C., & Oliver R. (2000). Designing learning environment for cultural inclusivity: A case study of indigenous online learning at tertiary level. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16, 58-72.
  21. Mikroyannidis, A., Kroop, S., & Wolpers, M. (2015). Personal learning environments (PLEs): Visions and concepts. In S. Kroop, A. Mikroyannidis, & M. Wolpers (Eds.), Responsive open learning environments. Outcomes of research from the ROLE project (pp. 1-16). Cham: Springer.
  22. Moore, A., Macarthur, V., & Conlan, O. (2012). Core aspects of affective metacognitive user models. In L. Ardissono, & T. Kuflik (Eds.), Advances in User Modeling: selected papers from UMAP 2011 workshops. LNCS vol. 7138 (pp. 47–59). Berlin:
  23. Mpondo, F., Courtemanche, F., & Aïmeur, E. (2010). CAMPERE: Cultural adaptation methodology for pedagogical resources in e-learning. In The 3th International Workshop on Culturally-Aware Tutoring Systems at ITS 2010 (pp. 37-46).
  24. Niedenthal, P.M., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2006). Psychology of emotion interpersonal, experimental, and cognitive approaches. New York: Psychology Press.
  25. Park, J., Barash, V., Fink, C., & Cha, M. (2007). Emoticon style: Interpreting differences in emoticons across cultures. In Proceedings of the Seventh AAAI Conference on 98 Steiner, Wesiak, Moore, Dagger, Conlan, and Albert
  26. Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452502).
  27. Reinecke, K. & Bernstein, A. (2011). Improving performance, perceived usability, and aesthetics with culturally adaptive user interfaces. ACM Transactions on ComputerHuman Interaction, 18.
  28. Reinecke, K. & Bernstein, A. (2013). Knowing what a user likes: A design science approach to interfaces that automatically adapt to culture. MIS Quarterly, 37, 427-453.
  29. Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B., & Koedinger, K. (2007). Designing for metacognition– applying Cognitive Tutor principles to metacognitive tutoring. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 125-140.
  30. Schraw, G. (2009). Measuring metacognitive judgments. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 415-429). New
  31. Steiner, C., Wesiak, G., Moore, A., Dagger, D., Conlan, O., & Albert, D. (2013). Does culture matter in TEL? A case study on cultural variations in learning. Presentation at the 1st Workshop on Culturally-aware Technology Enhanced Learning. EC-TEL 2013. 17th September 2013, Paphos, Cyprus.
  32. Stolp, S. & Zabrucky, K.M. (2009). Contributions of metacognitive and self-regulated learning theories to investigations of calibration of comprehension. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2.
  33. Tobias, S. & Everson, S. (2009). The importance of knowing what you know. A knowledge monitoring framework for studying metacognition in education. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 107-127). New York: Routledge.
  34. Turingan, J.P. & Yang, Y.-C. (2009). Across-cultural comparison of self-regulated learning skills between Korean and Filipino college students. Asian Social Science, 5, 3-10.
  35. Veltri, N. & Elgarah, W. (2009). The role of national culture differences in user adoption of social networking. In SAIS 2009 Proceedings (pp. 169-174).
  36. Wesiak, G., Steiner, C., Moore, A., Dagger, D., Power, G., Berthold, M., Albert, D., & Conlan, O. (2014). Iterative Augmentation of a Medical Training Simulator: Effects

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.