You are here:

Managing knowledge with computer-based mapping tools
PROCEEDINGS

, Knowledge Media Research Center (KMRC), Germany

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-48-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

Modern computer-based mapping tools may be used to visualize not only concept knowledge like traditional concept mapping tools, but also content knowledge (annotations, text and multimedia cognitive artifacts), knowledge about knowledge resources (e.g. websites, WBT programs, tools), as well as links between knowledge elements. In addition they provide free interactive access to mapped knowledge elements and, thus, may enhance knowledge use. It is suggested that computer-based mapping tools, in particular hypertext-like tools, may augment the capacity of the human brain in managing knowledge when students cope in a self-regulated manner with complex cognitive processing tasks, e.g. problem-based learning, web-based studying, hypertext writing. The paper aims at analyzing the potential of computerized mapping tools for supporting individual knowledge managing in e-learning scenarios.

Citation

Tergan, S.O. (2003). Managing knowledge with computer-based mapping tools. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2003--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2514-2517). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 4, 2023 from .

© 2003 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Boechler, P.M., & Dawson, M.R.W. (2002). Effects of navigation tool information on hypertext navigation behavior: A configurational analysis of page-transition data. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11 (2), 95-115.
  2. Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2002). The Mind Map book (rev. Ed.). London: BBC.
  3. Coffey, J.W., Hoffmann, R.R., Canas, A.J., & Ford, K.M. (2002). A Concept Map-Based Knowledge Modeling Approach to Expert Knowledge Sharing (Online available: http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/acanas/Publications/IKS2002/IKS.htm).
  4. Dees, S.M., Dansereau, D.F., Peel, J.L., Boatler, J.G., & Knight, R.J. (1991). Using conceptual matrices, knowledge maps, and scripted cooperation to improve personal management strategies. Journal of Drug Education , 21 (3) , 211-230.
  5. Fischer, F. & Mandl, H. (2001). Facilitating the construction of shared knowledge with graphical representation tools in face-to-face and computer-mediated scenarios. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), Proceedings of euro-CSCL 2001 (Maastricht, NL, March 2001) (pp. 230-236).
  6. Jacobson, M.J. & Levin, J.A. (1995). Conceptual frameworks for network learning environments: constructing personal and shared knowledge spaces. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1 (4) , 367–388.
  7. Jonassen, D.H. (1987). Assessing cognitive structure: Verifying a method using pattern notes. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20 (3) , 1-14.
  8. Jacobson, M.J., & Levin, J.A. (1995). Conceptual frameworks for network learning environments: Constructing personal and shared knowledge spaces. Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1 (4), 367-388.
  9. Marshall, C.C. (2001). The haunting question of intelligibility. Paper presented at the eleventh Hypertext ´01 (Aarhus, Denmark, August 14-18, 2001) (Online available: http://www.csdl.tamu.edu/~shipman/SpatialHypertext/SH1/marshall.pdf).
  10. Maurer, H., & Sapper, M. (2001). E-Learning has to be seen as part of general knowledge management. Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2001 (pp. 1249-1235), Tampere, AACE, Charlottesville, VA.
  11. McAleese, R. (2000). Concept mapping: a critical review. Innovations in Education and Training International, 36 (4) , 351-360.
  12. McAleese, R., Grabinger, S., & Fisher, K. (1999). The Knowledge Arena: a learning environment that underpins concept mapping. Paper presented at the AERA ´99 conference. (Online available: http://www.cst.hw.ac.uk/~ray/3_01.PDF).
  13. Novak, J.D. (1990). Concept mapping: a useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 937-949.
  14. Probst, G., Raub, S., & Romhardt, K. (1999). Wissen managen. Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen. Frankfurt am Main, Wiesbaden: FAZ/Gabler. SMART Ideas (http://www.smarttech.com/products/smartideas/index.asp).
  15. Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., & Coulson, R.L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31 , 24–33.
  16. Wallace, D.S., West, S.W.C., Ware, A., & Dansereau, D.F. (1998). The effect of knowledge maps that incorporate gestalt principles on learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 5-16.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.