Assessing Pre-Service Teacher Attitudes and Skills with the Technology Integration Confidence Scale
Computers in the Schools Volume 26, Number 1, ISSN 0738-0569
As technology integration continues to gain importance, preservice teachers must develop higher levels of confidence and proficiency in using technology in their classrooms (Kay, 2006). The acceptance of the National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS-T) by National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) has compelled teacher education programs to reexamine their curricula. However, most of these efforts lack the theory-based measures (Netemeyer, Bearden, & Sharma, 2003) of NETS-T dispositions and proficiency. In an effort to address this need, the Technology Integration Confidence Scale (TICS) was developed at Brigham Young University's McKay School of Education. This article describes the development of the TICS, which consists of 28 self-efficacy items based on tasks described in the NETS-T. It was pilot tested on preservice teachers during the spring 2006 term (N = 52), and the results were analyzed for item functioning and reliability. Evidence was also gathered to support the result's validity. (Contains 3 tables.)
Browne, J. (2009). Assessing Pre-Service Teacher Attitudes and Skills with the Technology Integration Confidence Scale. Computers in the Schools, 26(1), 4-20.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Carrie Lewis, Minnesota State University, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 15, No. 2 (June 2015) pp. 235–254
Tessellations in TPACK: Comparing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Levels Among K-12 Online and Traditional Teachers
Kent Sabo & Leanna Archambault, Arizona State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 4751–4756
Swapna Kumar, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States; Katya Vigil, Boston University, MA, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010 (Oct 18, 2010) pp. 1908–1913
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.