Contradictions in a distance course for a marginalized population at a Middle Eastern university
ARTICLE
Irshat Madyarov, American University of Armenia ; Aida Taef, Baha’i Institute for Higher Education
IRRODL Volume 13, Number 2, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press
Abstract
This study explores six cases of non-native English speaking students engaged in a distance English-medium course on critical thinking at a university in Iran. Framed within activity theory, the study investigated students’ course-related activity systems with a particular focus on contradictions that underlie any human activity. The construct of contradictions provides a theoretical lens to understand a web of relationships among a number of elements in course-related activities situated in a cultural-historical setting beset with political controversies, technological challenges, and needs for a bilingual curriculum. The findings indicate that all student participants had multiple activity systems within the course environment. Most participants had primary, secondary, and quaternary contradictions that had positive and negative consequences on the expansion of their activity systems. Discussion also includes practical implications for the distance university under study that could potentially be applied to similar distance schools.
Citation
Madyarov, I. & Taef, A. (2012). Contradictions in a distance course for a marginalized population at a Middle Eastern university. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 77-100. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/49462/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Barab, S.A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (2002). Using activity theory to understand the systemic tensions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 76-107.
- Basharina, O.K. (2007). An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration. Language Learning& Technology, 11(2), 82103.
- Berge, O., & Fjuk, A. (2006). Understanding the roles of online meetings in a net-based course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 13-23.
- Brown, J.S., & Adler, R.P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(1), 16-32. Retrieved from www.educause.edu
- Caswell, T., Henson, S., Jensen, M., & Wiley, D. (2008). Open educational resources: Enabling universal education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1), 1-11. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/469.
- Dippe, G. (2006). The missing teacher: Contradictions and conflicts in the experience of online learners. Retrieved from http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/19/03/03/PDF/Gunther-Dippe-2006.pdf.
- Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity–theoretical approach to developmental research. Retrieved from http://communication.ucsd.edu/MCA/Paper/Engeström/expanding/toc.htm
- Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity–theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
- Fåhræus, E.R. (2004). Distance education students moving towards collaborative learning-A field study of Australian distance education students and systems. Educational Technology& Society, 7(2), 129-140.
- Hardman, J. (2007). Making sense of the meaning maker: Tracking the object of activity in a computer-based mathematics lesson using activity theory. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 3(4), 110-130.
- Bahá’í Institute for Higher Education. (2011). History and overview. Retrieved from www.bihe.org.
- Ilyenkov, E.V. (1982). Dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s Capital. Retrieved from www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/works/abstract/index.htm.
- Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Leont’ev, A.N. (1975). Deyatelnost. Soznanie. Lichnost. [Activity, Consciousness, Personality]. Moscow: Politizdtat.
- Leont’ev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Retrieved from the Marxist Internet Archive Website: http://marxists.anu.edu.au/archive/leontev/works/1978/index.htm.
- Leont’ev, A.N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
- Leont’ev, A.N. (1989). The problem of activity in the history of Soviet psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(1), 22-39.
- Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE. Publications, Inc.
- Murphy, E., & Rodrigues-Manzanares, M.A. (2008). Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 442-457.
- Mwanza, D. (2002). Towards an activity-oriented design method for HCI research and practice (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from The Open University, United Kingdom: http://iet.open.ac.uk/pp/D.mwanza/Phd.htm.
- Vygotsky, L.S. (1982). Problemy obshei psikhologii. [Problems of general psychology]. Moscow: Pedagogika. 100
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References