Investigating and Comparing User Experiences of Course Management Systems: BlackBoard vs. Moodle ARTICLE
Zafer Unal, USF St. Petersburg, United States ; Aslihan Unal, Florida State University, United States
Journal of Interactive Learning Research Volume 25, Number 1, ISSN 1093-023X Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
The goal of this study is to report the results of a comparative usability study conducted in 2008-2009 on two different course management systems (CMS), BlackBoard and Moodle. 135 students enrolled in the fall 2008 and spring 2009 section of Introduction to Educational Technology participated in the study (72 and 63 respectively). At the beginning of each semester, participants were randomly divided into two groups to experience different CMS’s at different times. The results indicated that Moodle was favored in all modules used during the courses. This article presents the details of this initial attempt on investigating if an open source CMS (Moodle) warrants a consideration as an alternative to the institution’s current CMS (BlackBoard).
Unal, Z. & Unal, A. (2014). Investigating and Comparing User Experiences of Course Management Systems: BlackBoard vs. Moodle. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 25(1), 101-123. Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 23, 2017 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/35996/.
© 2014 AACE
- BlackBoard. (2010). BlackBoard Incorporation, retrieved May 25, 2010 from www.blackboard.com .
- Brown, B. L. (2000). Web-based training. EriC Clearinghouse on adult, Career,
- Dray S. And siegel D. (2004). Remote Possibilities? international Usability Testing at a Distance. Interactions. 11 (2), 2004, 10-17
- Elearnity. (2005). Blackboard acquires WebCT, retrieved May 25, 2010 from http://www.elearnity.com/eKCload.htm?load=ByKey/DWin6h6CTB.
- Gilbert, L., & Moore, D. (1998). Building interactivity in Web courses: Tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 38, 29–35.
- Graham, M., & Scarborough, H. (2001). Enhancing the learning environment for distance education students. Distance Education, 22(2), 232-244.
- Insidehighered. (2010). Blackboard Buys Angel, inside higher education Organization, retrieved May 25, 2010 from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/05/07/bb
- Inversini, A., Botturi, L., & Triacca, L. (2006). Evaluating LMS Usability for Enhanced eLearning Experience. Paper presented at the eDMeDia Conference, Orlando, florida.
- Kearsley, G. (1997). A guide to online education. Retrieved May 1, 2010, from http://gwis.circ.gwu.edu/etl/online.html
- Kidney, G., & Puckett, E. (2003). Rediscovering the first principles through online learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4, 203–212.
- Machado, M. & Tao, E. (2007). Blackboard vs. Moodle: Comparing User Experience of Learning Management Systems. Paper presented at the 37th asee/ieee frontiers in education Conference, Milwaukee, Wi.
- Merrill, M. (1997). Instructional strategies that teach. Computer Based Training Solutions, 1–11.
- Moodle. (2010). Moodle Organization, retrieved May 25, 2010 from www.blackboard.com .
- Nielsen, J. (2003). Usability 101: Fundamentals and definitions—what,
- Oliver, R. (1999). Exploring strategies for online teaching and learning. Distance Education, 20 (2), 240-254.
- Rovai, A.P., Ponton, M.K., & Baker, J.D. (2008). Distance learning in higher education. A programmatic approach to planning, design, instruction, evaluation, and accreditation. NewYork, nY: Teachers College Press.
- Rowley, D. E. (1994). Usability testing in the field: bringing the laboratory to the user. Proceedings of the siGChi conference on human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, 252-257.
- Rozanski, E. P., & Haake, A. R. (2003). Curriculum and content: The many facets of HCI. Paper presented at the 4th Conference on information Technology Curriculum on information Technology education, lafayette, in
- Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the User Interface, Third edition. Pearson education.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.