Measuring the Impact of Robotics and Geospatial Technologies on Youth Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Attitudes PROCEEDINGS
Gwen Nugent, Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families, and Schools, United States ; Bradley Barker, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States ; Michael Toland, University of Kentucky, United States ; Neal Grandgenett, University of Nebraska-Omaha, United States ; Amy Hampton, Viacheslav Adamchuk, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Honolulu, HI, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-73-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
The Nebraska 4-H organization has developed a robotics and geospatial technologies instructional program for middle school youth (ages 11 to 15 years). Research and evaluation results across the three years of the project have shown that the program has positively impacted student learning, but the impact on student attitudes has been difficult to document, largely because of the difficulty in measuring attitudes. This paper describes the three-year process to assess the attitudinal impact of the robotics/geospatial program and discusses the measurement challenges. There were problems in using existing, published attitudinal instruments and challenges in developing and validating scores from a new instrument. Results are reported from the use of this new instrument with 147 middle school youth attending six 4-H facilitated summer camps focused on robotics and geospatial technologies. The Likert-scaled instrument, showing items for the eight scales, is included with this paper.
Nugent, G., Barker, B., Toland, M., Grandgenett, N., Hampton, A. & Adamchuk, V. (2009). Measuring the Impact of Robotics and Geospatial Technologies on Youth Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Attitudes. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2009--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3331-3340). Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 15, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/31957/.
© 2009 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Alsop, S. & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1043 – 1047.
- Barker, B., Nugent, G., & Grandgenett, N. (2008). Examining 4-H robotics and geospatial technologies in the learning of science, technology, and mathematics topics. Journal of Extension, 46(3), www.joe.org/joe/2008june/rub7.shtml.
- Barker, B., Nugent, G., Grandgenett, N., & Hampton, A. (2008). Examining 4-H robotics in the learning of science, engineering and technology topics and the related student attitudes. Journal of Youth Development: Bridging Research and Practice, 2(3).
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
- Bonvillian, W.B. (2002). "Science at a crossroads." FASEB Journal, 16, 915-919.
- Fleming, M.D., & Malone, M.R. (1983). The relationship of student characteristics and student performance in science as viewed by meta-analysis research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 481-495.
- Hu, L. & Bentler, P.M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55
- Jacobs, J.E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D.W., Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 7, 509-527.
- Koballa, T. & Glynn, S. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S. Abell& N. Lederman (Eds.) Handbook of Research in Science Education (pp. 75-102). Mahwah, New Jersey:
- Moore, R. & Foy, R. (1997). The scientific attitude inventory: A revision (SAI II). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 327-336.
- National Research Council. (2002). Helping Children Learn Math. Edited by J. Kirkpatrick and J. Swafford. Washington. D.C.: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2005). How Students Learn: Mathematics in the Classroom. Edited by M.S. Donovan and J.D. Bransford. Washington. D.C.: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council (2007). Taking Science to School. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.
- Nugent, G., Barker, B., & Grandgenett, N. (2008, July). The effect of 4-H robotics and geospatial technologies on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and attitudes. Proceedings of the EdMedia World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Vienna, Austria.
- OECD (2007). PISA 2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. Volume 1: Analysis.
- Pell, T., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 847-862.
- Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1999). A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
- Sorge, C. (2007). What happens: relationship of age and gender with science attitudes from elementary to middle school. Science Educator, 16, 33 – 37.
- Stake, J., & Mares, K. (2005). Evaluation the impact of science-enrichment programs on adolescent’s science motivation and confidence: the splashdown effect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 359-375.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.
The Impact of Robotics Competitions on Youth STEM Learning, Attitudes and 21st Century workplace Skills
Gwen Nugent, Bradley Barker & Andrew White, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States; Neal Grandgenett, University of Nebraska at Omaha, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2011 (Jun 27, 2011) pp. 3614–3619
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.