You are here:

The Relationship between Teaching Presence and Student Course Outcomes in an Online International Population

, University of the District of Columbia, United States ; , Azusa Pacific University, United States

International Journal on E-Learning Volume 17, Number 1, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

A causal comparative research design was utilized in this study to examine the relationship between international students’ perceptions of teacher presence in the online learning environment and students’ achievement as measured by end of course grades. Spearman’s analysis indicated no statistically significant correlation between the composite teaching presence scores and end of course grades. Further analysis of the individual subscale teaching presence scores and end of course grades revealed no statistically significant correlations between instructional design and organization and end of course grades, or facilitation of discourse and end of course grades. Despite literature that suggests that teaching presence is one of the most important factors in building community in the classroom, the results of this study suggest otherwise.
Key terms: Community of inquiry, international students, sense of community, social presence teaching presence, online learning.

Citation

Wendt, J. & Courduff, J. (2018). The Relationship between Teaching Presence and Student Course Outcomes in an Online International Population. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(1), 111-129. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 14, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conference context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  3. Bista, K., & Foster, C. (2011). Issues of international student retention in American higher education. The International Journal of Research and Review, 7(2), 1-10.
  4. Carley-Baxter, L.R., Hill, C.A., Roe, D.J., Twiddy, S.E., Baxter, R.K., & Ruppenkamp, J. (2009). Does response rate matter? Journal editors use of survey quality measures in manuscript publication decisions. Survey Practice, 2(7), 1-7.
  5. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
  6. Erichsen, E., & Bolliger, D. (2011). Towards understanding international graduate student isolation in traditional and online environments. Educational Technology Research& Development, 59(3), 309-326.
  7. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a textbased environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
  8. Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Vaughan, N. (2015). The community of inquiry. Retrieved from https://coi.athabascau.ca/ Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of International Relations, 10, 301-320.
  9. Jinks, S.E. (2009). An examination of teaching presence and the sense of community on perceived student learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Florida.
  10. Kupczynski, L., Ice, P., Wiesenmayer, R., & McCluskey, F. (2010). Student perceptions of the relationship between indicators of teaching presence and success in online courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 2343.
  11. Ladyshewsky, R.K. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1-23.
  12. Lin, M. (2012). Students of different minds: Bridging the gaps of international students studying in the US. US-China Education Review, 3, 333-344.
  13. Miller, G.M., Hahs-Vaughn, D.L., & Zygouris-Coe, V. (2014). A confirmatory factor analysis of teaching presence within online professional development. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(1), 1-29.
  14. Morgan, T. (2011). Online classroom or community-in-the-making? Instructor conceptualizations and teaching presence in international online contexts. The Journal of Distance Education, 25(1), 1-13.
  15. Rockinson-Szapkiw, A.J., Wendt, J.L., Wighting, M., & Nisbet, D. (2016). The predictive relationship among the CoI framework, perceived learning, and online graduate students’ course grades. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3).
  16. Rovai, A.P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 197-211.
  17. Russo, T., & Benson, S. (2005). Learning with invisible others: Perceptions of online presence and their relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Educational Technology& Society, 8(1), 54-62.
  18. Sadykova, G. (2014). Mediating knowledge through peer-to-peer interaction in a multicultural online learning environment: A case study of international students in the US. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 24-49.
  19. Sadykova, G., & Dautermann, J. (2009). Crossing cultures and borders in international online distance higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(2), 89-114.
  20. Shea, P., Li, C.S., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4), 59-82.
  21. Shea, P., Li, C.S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 175-190.
  22. Sheridan, K., & Kelly, M.A. (2010). The indicators of instructor presence that are important to students in online courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 767-779.
  23. Swan, K., Garrison, D.R., & Richardson, J.C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. In Payne, C.R. (Ed.) Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 43-57.
  24. Wang, C., & Reeves, T.C. (2007). Synchronous online learning experiences: The perspectives of international students from Taiwan. Educational Media International, 44(4), 339-356.
  25. Warner, R.M. (2014). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques. Los Angeles: Sage.
  26. Xiaojing, L., Shijuan, L., Seung-hee, L., & Magjuka, R.J. (2010). Cultural differences in online learning: International student perceptions. Journal of Educational Technology& Society, 13(3), 177-188.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.